Notifications
Clear all

Do you really need extra insurance for a rental in Montana?

790 Posts
721 Users
0 Reactions
17.1 K Views
Posts: 4
(@books_rain)
New Member
Joined:

I hear you on the fine print—those exclusions are sneaky. I’ve always wondered how much those “premium” rental insurances actually cover, especially when you’re used to driving something a bit fancier. Honestly, I just assume my card’s coverage is solid, but now you’ve got me second-guessing that. Had a friend get dinged for a scratch on a rental Mercedes once and his card refused to pay because of a speeding ticket from two years back. Total nightmare.

It’s wild how they’ll take your money for the insurance but then find any excuse not to pay out. I usually go for the extra coverage just for peace of mind, especially if it’s something I’d be upset about scratching. Not cheap, but less stressful than arguing with insurance later... and Montana roads can be rough on nice cars. Guess it comes down to how much risk you’re willing to take.


Reply
Posts: 13
(@chef76)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from. Those exclusions are a pain, and the “premium” coverage isn’t always as bulletproof as they make it sound. I’ve had my own run-ins with rental companies nitpicking over minor stuff, and it’s never fun. I tend to go for the extra coverage too, especially if I’m driving something that’d cost a fortune to fix. It’s not cheap, but like you said—less hassle than fighting with insurance later. Montana roads can be brutal, so I’d rather pay a bit more upfront than risk a big bill down the line.


Reply
Posts: 13
(@zallen58)
Active Member
Joined:

I get the logic behind paying extra for peace of mind, but honestly, I’ve started skipping the extra insurance lately. I know Montana roads can be rough, but I feel like the rental companies are just banking on people’s fear. Like you said,

“the ‘premium’ coverage isn’t always as bulletproof as they make it sound.”
That’s been my experience too—there’s always some loophole or fine print.

I’ve got pretty solid coverage through my credit card and my regular auto insurance, so doubling up just feels like throwing money away. Last time I rented, I actually read through the rental agreement (painful, but worth it), and most of the stuff they try to sell you is already covered. Sure, if you’re driving something fancy or you don’t have good insurance, maybe it makes sense. But for me, I’d rather save the cash and just be extra careful. Guess it depends on your risk tolerance and how much you trust your own driving... or luck.


Reply
markgarcia170
Posts: 5
(@markgarcia170)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you're coming from, but I’ve seen people get burned thinking their credit card or auto policy would cover everything—then they find out about exclusions after the fact. Montana’s got some wild hailstorms and gravel roads... not every policy covers “loss of use” or diminished value, either. Sometimes the rental company’s coverage fills those weird gaps, even if it’s overpriced. Worth double-checking the fine print on your own policies, just in case.


Reply
katiecollector
Posts: 10
(@katiecollector)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve run into this exact situation before, actually—thought my credit card’s coverage was bulletproof, but then the rental company hit me with a “loss of use” charge after a fender bender. Turns out, my card only covered physical damage, not the income they lost while the car was in the shop. That was a fun surprise...

Here’s how I handle it now when renting in places like Montana:

1. Call your auto insurance and ask specifically about rental coverage—don’t just assume it matches your regular policy.
2. Check if your credit card covers rentals, and get them to send you the actual policy wording. Look for exclusions like “off-road,” “hail,” or “loss of use.”
3. If you’re planning to drive on gravel or rural roads (which is pretty much unavoidable in Montana), ask both your insurer and credit card company if that’s covered.
4. Compare what’s missing with what the rental company offers. Sometimes their coverage fills those weird gaps, even if it costs more.

It’s a bit of a hassle upfront, but way better than getting stuck with a bill later.


Reply
Page 115 / 158
Share:
Scroll to Top