Notifications
Clear all

Do you really need extra insurance for a rental in Montana?

803 Posts
733 Users
0 Reactions
17.5 K Views
Posts: 22
(@melissat41)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Extra Insurance in Montana Is Worth It

Yeah, same here—after a run-in with a deer on a backroad a few years ago, I don’t take chances anymore. I’ve noticed a lot of rental contracts specifically exclude coverage if you’re driving on “unimproved” roads, which is basically half of Montana. Even if your own insurance or credit card covers rentals, they can get really picky about what counts as “normal use.”

Couple things I always look at:
- Some rental companies sneak in those “gravel road” exclusions in the fine print. One time, I thought I was covered and got dinged for a flat tire because it happened on a county road.
- If you’re driving anywhere near construction zones or logging trucks, chips and dings are almost guaranteed. Doesn’t matter how careful you are.

I get that the extra cost stings, but for me, peace of mind is worth it. Montana’s gorgeous, but it’s rough on cars... I’d rather not gamble with a rental bill that could ruin my trip.


Reply
jamescalligrapher
Posts: 4
(@jamescalligrapher)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, reading your post makes me feel a lot better about leaning toward the extra insurance. I’ve been stressing over all the fine print and exclusions—never realized how many ways they can deny coverage if you’re not on a “main” road. The bit about gravel roads is wild... I’d probably end up in the same boat with a flat or a chipped windshield. It’s not cheap, but I’d rather pay a little more upfront than get stuck with a huge bill later. Thanks for sharing your experience—it’s super helpful for someone like me who’s just figuring this stuff out.


Reply
Posts: 25
(@jack_lee)
Eminent Member
Joined:

never realized how many ways they can deny coverage if you’re not on a “main” road. The bit about gravel roads is wild...

Honestly, the first time I rented a car in Montana, I thought “how bad could it be?” Fast forward to me crawling along some scenic backroad that was basically just rocks and dust, and then—bam—tiny pebble, windshield chip. Rental company guy gave me that look like he’d seen it a hundred times: “You didn’t get the extra coverage, did you?” I swear, those exclusions are sneakier than a raccoon at a campsite.

I get why people skip it—nobody wants to pay more than they have to. But the stress of wondering if every bump or bug splat is going to cost you hundreds? Not really worth it, at least for me. Montana’s gorgeous, but man, those roads aren’t messing around. Sometimes peace of mind is worth the extra few bucks... especially when gravel seems to be everywhere you want to go.


Reply
Posts: 3
(@donaldm76)
New Member
Joined:

Yeah, those “main road only” clauses are wild. I learned the hard way in Wyoming—thought my regular car insurance would cover me, but nope, not for gravel roads. Ended up paying for a tire that looked like it’d been through a cheese grater. Now I just budget for the extra coverage if I’m headed anywhere rural. It’s annoying, but honestly, it beats sweating every time you hear a rock ping off the hood. Anyone else ever try to argue with a rental agent about what counts as a “main” road? That’s a losing battle...


Reply
Posts: 2
(@photography554)
New Member
Joined:

I’ve had that same argument with a rental agent in Bozeman—tried to convince them the gravel road to my cabin was “basically a highway” since it showed up on Google Maps. Didn’t fly. Honestly, after one close call with a cracked windshield, I just pay for the extra insurance now. It’s not cheap, but neither is replacing a tire or dealing with their paperwork circus. Those backroads are no joke...


Reply
Page 158 / 161
Share:
Scroll to Top