Notifications
Clear all

Insurance paid way less than what it cost me to replace my roof

447 Posts
421 Users
0 Reactions
16.9 K Views
gadgeteer52
Posts: 16
(@gadgeteer52)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: Insurance Paid Way Less Than What It Cost Me To Replace My Roof

Funny thing, he kept saying “depreciation” like it was some magic word. Reminded me of when I tried to insure my ‘68 Mustang and they wanted to value it like a rusty Civic...

That “depreciation” bit gets people every time. It’s not just a magic word—more like the fine print that bites you later. Here’s the thing: most standard policies pay out on an Actual Cash Value (ACV) basis unless you specifically have Replacement Cost Value (RCV) coverage. With ACV, they basically take what your roof would cost new, then subtract for age and wear. So if your roof’s ten years old, they’re not giving you enough for a brand-new one, just what your old one was “worth” at the time of loss. That’s where the numbers start looking way off.

If you want to avoid that next time, double-check if your policy has RCV for roofs. Sometimes it’s an add-on or only available for newer roofs, but it means you’d get the full replacement cost (minus deductible), not just the depreciated value.

Another thing—some policies have “cosmetic damage exclusions” or even weird limitations based on roof material or age. I’ve seen folks get tripped up by that, especially with metal roofs or anything over 15 years old. Not saying it’s fair, but it’s in there.

Dragging your agent into the weeds is honestly the best move. I know it can feel like pulling teeth, but if you don’t ask, you’ll never know what’s hiding in those clauses. And yeah, sometimes we’re just as baffled by the legalese as anyone else... but we’re supposed to translate it.

One tip: after any big claim (like a roof), ask for a copy of the adjuster’s report and go through it line by line. If something doesn’t make sense—like they marked your shingles as “20 years old” when they’re only 12—call them out on it. Adjusters make mistakes too.

Long story short: depreciation is real, but there are ways around it if you know what to look for before you need to file a claim. And if your agent seems annoyed by questions, maybe time to shop around...


Reply
Posts: 19
(@naturalist63)
Eminent Member
Joined:

That “depreciation” line gets me too.

“most standard policies pay out on an Actual Cash Value (ACV) basis unless you specifically have Replacement Cost Value (RCV) coverage.”
This is spot on—learned it the hard way with my camper’s awning last year. One thing I’d add: if you ever upgrade your roof (like impact-resistant shingles), some insurers give a discount, but you have to tell them. Otherwise, they’ll just value it like the old one. Always double-check those details before storm season rolls in...


Reply
activist75
Posts: 10
(@activist75)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, the ACV vs RCV thing tripped me up too. I thought I was covered for the full replacement until I saw the payout—ouch. And you’re right about the roof upgrades. If you don’t mention it, they just treat it like the old shingles... learned that one the hard way after a hailstorm. Insurance fine print is wild sometimes.


Reply
kennethcamper
Posts: 21
(@kennethcamper)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Man, I had no idea there was such a big difference between ACV and RCV until I started shopping around. It’s honestly kind of sneaky how they don’t make it obvious. I almost went with the cheaper policy, but after hearing stories like yours, I figured paying a bit more for RCV was worth the peace of mind. The roof upgrades thing is wild too—like, shouldn’t they want you to have better materials? Guess not if it costs them more. Insurance really is a maze...


Reply
poetry754
Posts: 16
(@poetry754)
Active Member
Joined:

- Totally agree, the ACV vs. RCV thing is a trap for people trying to save a few bucks.
-

“shouldn’t they want you to have better materials? Guess not if it costs them more.”
Yeah, but insurance is all about their bottom line, not yours.
- I got burned by ACV once—thought I was covered, ended up paying thousands out of pocket. Never again.
- Curious, did your agent actually explain the difference or did you just find out by digging through the fine print?


Reply
Page 25 / 90
Share:
Scroll to Top