Notifications
Clear all

Ever had to deal with car insurance claims in SD? Quick poll

68 Posts
67 Users
0 Reactions
357 Views
jmoore83
Posts: 8
(@jmoore83)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a similar experience myself, though thankfully caught it early. After a minor rear-end collision, the adjuster initially said it was just cosmetic damage to the bumper. But being cautious by nature, I insisted on a second opinion from my trusted mechanic. Turned out there was hidden structural damage affecting the alignment and suspension—nothing major, but enough to cause uneven tire wear and handling issues down the line. Insurance ended up covering it after some back-and-forth, but it definitely reinforced my belief in getting a thorough inspection before closing any claim. It's always worth the extra effort upfront to avoid bigger headaches later...

Reply
Posts: 8
(@jessicawriter967)
Active Member
Joined:

Glad you caught that early—hidden structural issues can really sneak up on you and become costly down the road. I've seen similar situations where adjusters initially underestimate damage, probably to keep claims low. A friend of mine had a minor fender-bender, and the insurance insisted it was just cosmetic. He took their word for it, but months later he noticed uneven tire wear and handling problems. Turned out the frame had a slight bend affecting alignment, and by then insurance wouldn't cover it since he'd already settled.

Makes me wonder how often these hidden damages get overlooked or intentionally minimized by adjusters. Has anyone here ever successfully reopened a claim after discovering additional damage later on? Curious how flexible insurers typically are in these scenarios...

Reply
Posts: 7
(@ashley_sage)
Active Member
Joined:

"Makes me wonder how often these hidden damages get overlooked or intentionally minimized by adjusters."

Honestly, as someone still getting the hang of driving (and parking... don't judge), this thread is giving me anxiety, lol. My older sister had a similar issue—insurance said it was just a bumper scratch, but later her trunk wouldn't close properly. Turns out the latch alignment was off. Makes me wonder if adjusters are just rushing through inspections or if it's intentional to save money. Has anyone actually had luck reopening a claim later? Seems tricky...

Reply
sarahpupper504
Posts: 2
(@sarahpupper504)
New Member
Joined:

Turns out the latch alignment was off. Makes me wonder if adjusters are just rushing through inspections or if it's intentional to save money.

I've actually reopened a claim before, wasn't as bad as I expected. Had a similar issue—insurance said it was just cosmetic damage, but later found out the impact messed up my alignment. Took a bit of back-and-forth, photos, and a mechanic's statement, but they eventually covered it. Honestly, I think adjusters are just swamped and rushing through inspections rather than intentionally cutting corners. Still, always worth double-checking everything yourself afterward... especially if you're still mastering parking skills (no judgment here, parallel parking still gives me nightmares).

Reply
Posts: 6
(@dobby_sage)
Active Member
Joined:

I've had a similar experience, though mine was a bit more subtle. A few months back, someone backed into my rear bumper in a parking lot—looked minor at first glance, just some scratches and paint transfer. Insurance adjuster came out, took a quick look, and said it was purely cosmetic. I wasn't entirely convinced, so I took it to my dealership anyway (I tend to be overly cautious with these things). Turns out the impact had slightly misaligned one of the rear sensors and damaged the mounting brackets behind the bumper cover.

Initially, insurance pushed back a bit, claiming it wasn't related to the accident. But after I provided detailed documentation from the dealership—including photos and their written assessment—they reconsidered and covered everything without much fuss. To be fair, I don't think the adjuster was intentionally trying to shortchange me; he seemed genuinely overwhelmed with appointments that day. Still, it does make you wonder if they're pressured to move quickly through inspections due to workload or company policy.

Either way, it's always wise to get a second opinion from someone you trust. Even minor-looking damage can hide bigger issues underneath... especially with modern cars loaded with sensors and electronics. Better safe than sorry when it comes to repairs on these vehicles—trust me, I've learned that lesson the hard way before.

Reply
Page 13 / 14
Share:
Scroll to Top