Notifications
Clear all

Do you really need extra insurance for a rental in Montana?

974 Posts
876 Users
0 Reactions
20.4 K Views
Posts: 16
(@amandaanderson160)
Active Member
Joined:

Been there, done that—watched a buddy try to claim damage on a rental in Glacier and the credit card company just shrugged because the road was “not regularly maintained.” He spent hours on the phone and still ended up paying out of pocket. I get it, nobody wants to pay extra, but in places like Montana, those “fine print” exclusions aren’t just theoretical. If you’re even thinking about gravel or forest roads, that extra insurance can be the difference between a minor annoyance and a wallet meltdown.


Reply
reader53
Posts: 19
(@reader53)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, the “not regularly maintained” clause can really bite you. I learned that the hard way in Wyoming—thought my card had me covered, but nope, gravel road = denied claim. It’s wild how many backroads aren’t considered maintained out there. Honestly, if you’re planning to leave the main highways, that extra insurance starts to look a lot less like a ripoff and more like peace of mind. Not cheap, but neither is a busted oil pan.


Reply
jfluffy39
Posts: 8
(@jfluffy39)
Active Member
Joined:

That “not maintained” bit catches a lot of folks off guard. Here’s what I usually tell people:

- Most credit card or basic rental coverage excludes unpaved roads, even if they look perfectly driveable.
- Montana’s full of those “unimproved” roads—if you’re headed to trailheads or fishing spots, it’s super easy to end up somewhere not covered.
- That extra insurance feels expensive until you see the bill for a cracked axle or oil pan.

It’s not always necessary if you’re sticking to paved highways, but if there’s any chance you’ll wander off the main drag, it’s usually worth it. Seen too many folks surprised by exclusions after the fact...


Reply
Posts: 30
(@pumpkininferno979)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Extra Insurance in Montana: Worth It or Waste of Money?

I get the hesitation—extra insurance always feels like a money grab, especially when you’re watching every dollar. But I learned the hard way that Montana’s a different beast. Last summer, I rented a compact to save cash and figured I’d just stick to the main roads. Ended up following a “shortcut” my buddy suggested to a fishing spot... looked fine, just gravel. Hit a pothole, bent the rim, and cracked something underneath. My credit card coverage didn’t touch it because it was “unimproved,” and the rental company charged me for everything.

Honestly, I usually skip the add-ons, but out there? If you’re even thinking about venturing off the highway, it’s not worth the gamble. The repair bill was way more than the insurance would’ve cost. If you’re 100% sure you’ll stay on pavement, maybe you can risk it—but Montana has a way of tempting you off the beaten path. Just my two cents from a guy who tried to save a buck and ended up paying way more.


Reply
cooperg62
Posts: 9
(@cooperg62)
Active Member
Joined:

Extra Insurance in Montana: Worth It or Waste of Money?

- Been there, paid that bill. Montana roads can chew up a car faster than my dog goes through chew toys.
- I drive a luxury sedan at home and I’m picky about my rides, so I always get the extra coverage when I rent—especially out west. One rogue rock and you’re suddenly financing a new bumper.
- Credit card insurance is great... until it isn’t. They love those “exceptions.” Unimproved roads? That’s half the state.
- If you’re the type who can resist a scenic detour, maybe you’ll be fine. But if you’re like me and see a mountain view and think, “Yeah, let’s check that out,” just pay for the peace of mind.
- Honestly, it’s less about the car and more about not having to argue with rental agents over what counts as “damage.”


Reply
Page 48 / 195
Share:
Scroll to Top