Notifications
Clear all

Do you really need extra insurance for a rental in Montana?

792 Posts
723 Users
0 Reactions
17.1 K Views
Posts: 18
(@vegan867)
Active Member
Joined:

Your own policy probably covers the basics, but rental companies love to tack on those “loss of use” fees and stuff like diminished value. I’ve seen folks get surprised by that. Credit card coverage can help, but yeah, the fine print is a beast. If you’re worried about rural roads or hail, sometimes the peace of mind is worth a few extra bucks, honestly.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@baileys61)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually seen a few cases where folks paid for the extra rental coverage and still got hit with weird fees after a fender bender. The “loss of use” thing is tricky—sometimes your regular policy or credit card will cover it, sometimes not, but rental companies can be relentless about squeezing out extra charges. I always tell people to double-check what their own insurance and card actually cover before shelling out for the rental company’s plan. That said, Montana’s weather can be wild, and I’ve had clients who were grateful they paid the extra when hail came out of nowhere. It’s a bit of a gamble either way.


Reply
chess902
Posts: 13
(@chess902)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s a really solid point about “loss of use”—it’s one of those sneaky fees that catches people off guard. Even if your regular auto policy or credit card says it covers rentals, the fine print can get weird, especially with things like administrative fees or diminished value. I’ve seen folks assume they’re totally covered, only to get a bill weeks later for “cleaning” or “processing” after a minor scrape.

One thing I usually suggest is calling both your insurance company and credit card provider before you travel. Ask them specifically about loss of use, admin fees, and weather-related damage. Montana’s hailstorms are no joke... I’ve had clients who thought they were just getting a quick weekend car, then got stuck with a $2,000 repair bill after a freak storm.

It’s definitely not always black and white—sometimes the rental company’s coverage is overkill, but other times it’s a lifesaver. If you’re risk-averse or just don’t want to deal with paperwork headaches later, paying extra can buy some peace of mind. Otherwise, just triple-check what you’re already covered for and keep all your documentation handy in case something goes sideways.


Reply
amanda_hill
Posts: 13
(@amanda_hill)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a buddy get dinged for “loss of use” after a deer ran into his rental near Bozeman—he thought his credit card had him covered, but nope, fine print got him. I’m usually a skeptic about extra insurance, but in Montana? I’d at least read the policy twice. Those storms and wildlife aren’t messing around.


Reply
Posts: 17
(@marksculptor)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, that “loss of use” bit trips up more folks than you’d think. I’ve seen it catch even the most careful planners off guard—especially out here where wildlife seems to have a personal vendetta against bumpers. Here’s how I usually break it down:

First, check what your credit card or personal auto policy actually covers. A lot of cards only handle collision and theft, but not those sneaky admin fees or loss of use charges rental companies tack on while the car’s in the shop. That’s the kicker—your buddy’s story is a classic example.

Second, if you’re renting anywhere rural (Montana definitely qualifies), ask yourself if you’d be cool paying out-of-pocket for stuff like hail damage or a moose encounter. If that makes you sweat a little, maybe spring for the extra coverage just this once.

And yeah, read every line of that policy. It’s boring, but it beats arguing with a rental desk after a deer decides to play chicken with your car.


Reply
Page 35 / 159
Share:
Scroll to Top