Notifications
Clear all

Do you really need extra insurance for a rental in Montana?

1,023 Posts
918 Users
0 Reactions
24 K Views
Posts: 27
(@culture_luna)
Eminent Member
Joined:

But yeah, double-check that fine print (especially the weird exclusions for gravel roads or wildlife). Learned that lesson the hard way...

That’s a key point—those exclusions can really trip people up, especially in places like Montana. A lot of folks assume their regular auto policy or credit card covers everything, but “loss of use” and damage from wildlife or gravel aren’t always included. Have you checked if your personal policy covers diminished value or administrative fees too? Those are sneaky ones rental companies love to tack on.

I’ve seen people get caught out because their insurance only kicks in if the rental is a replacement for a car that’s in the shop, not just any vacation rental. Also, some policies won’t cover SUVs or trucks, which are pretty common rentals out there. Did you look into whether your liability limits are high enough for Montana? Some states have higher minimums than others.

Honestly, I’d rather pay a little extra up front than risk a big bill later—especially with all those unpredictable Montana roads and critters. But yeah, it’s not always necessary if your own coverage is solid and you’re sticking to paved highways. Just depends how much risk you’re comfortable with.


Reply
film261
Posts: 16
(@film261)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I’m not totally convinced the extra insurance is always worth it.

-

“Honestly, I’d rather pay a little extra up front than risk a big bill later—especially with all those unpredictable Montana roads and critters.”

True, but if your personal policy is comprehensive and you’ve confirmed it covers rentals (including SUVs/trucks), you might just be doubling up for no reason.

- Most credit cards with rental coverage are secondary, but some are primary—worth checking before you pay more at the counter.

- Administrative fees and “loss of use” are annoying, but I’ve actually had luck disputing those with my insurer after the fact. Not always a slam dunk, but it’s not automatic out-of-pocket.

- If you’re sticking to paved roads and not planning any off-roading, the risk drops a lot. I’d just read the fine print and weigh the odds. Sometimes the peace of mind isn’t worth the extra $20/day, especially if you’re already well-covered.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@dukewhiskers880)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s a good point about “doubling up for no reason.” I’ve rented in Montana a few times and honestly, my own insurance plus my credit card coverage felt solid. The rental desk always tries to scare you with worst-case scenarios, but if you’re not off-roading or driving at night in elk country, the odds are pretty low. Like you said,

“Sometimes the peace of mind isn’t worth the extra $20/day, especially if you’re already well-covered.”
I’d rather put that cash toward gas or snacks for the road trip. Just gotta read your policies carefully and not get pressured at the counter.


Reply
Posts: 19
(@katie_pupper)
Active Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying, but I’ve had some close calls with deer and black ice up there, even in summer. My driving record isn’t spotless, so I usually take the extra coverage just in case… feels like cheap insurance for my peace of mind.


Reply
filmmaker52
Posts: 21
(@filmmaker52)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I hear you on the deer—those things are like furry missiles with no sense of self-preservation. I once had a buck leap out in front of a rental I’d just picked up, and let’s just say my heart rate didn’t come down for hours. Honestly, if your driving record’s got a few “character marks” and you’re dealing with Montana’s wild mix of weather, that extra coverage can save a lot of headache. It’s not always necessary, but sometimes it’s just worth it for the sleep at night... and to avoid explaining antler-shaped dents to the rental desk.


Reply
Page 179 / 205
Share:
Scroll to Top