Notifications
Clear all

Why California’s minimum car insurance might not be enough

611 Posts
571 Users
0 Reactions
9,989 Views
Posts: 18
(@jondrummer)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve had a similar wake-up call after a fender bender a few years back. The “state minimums” look fine on paper, but once you see the actual costs of medical care or even a couple of cars involved, it’s clear they don’t stretch far. Like you said:

One bad accident and you could be paying for years.

- Medical bills pile up fast—ambulance alone can be $1k+
- If you total someone’s newer car, minimum property damage won’t cover it
- Legal fees if you get sued? That’s a whole other headache

It’s wild how just a small bump in liability coverage barely moves the monthly premium, but it can save you from financial ruin. I’d never go back to bare minimum after seeing the numbers.


Reply
marleydiyer
Posts: 21
(@marleydiyer)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Honestly, I used to think the minimums were just fine too—until my cousin rear-ended a Tesla.

If you total someone’s newer car, minimum property damage won’t cover it
is no joke. The repair bill was more than my first car cost. It’s wild how fast those numbers add up. I’d rather pay a few extra bucks a month than risk getting buried in debt over one mistake.


Reply
jlee84
Posts: 4
(@jlee84)
New Member
Joined:

That’s a good point—repair costs on newer cars, especially EVs, are just on another level. I used to think the minimums were enough too, but after seeing a neighbor deal with a similar situation, I bumped up my coverage. It’s not that much more, and the peace of mind is worth it for me.


Reply
mollyl35
Posts: 18
(@mollyl35)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I’m with you on this. The minimums might’ve made sense years ago, but with the way car prices (and repair costs) have shot up, it’s just not realistic anymore. I had a fender bender last year—nothing major, but the bill for the other guy’s bumper and sensors was more than I expected. I kept thinking, if it’d been a Tesla or something newer, my coverage would’ve been toast.

It’s easy to underestimate how fast those costs add up, especially in California where even “minor” accidents can get expensive. I did the math and bumping my liability limits wasn’t a huge jump in premium, but it covered way more. Not saying everyone needs max coverage, but the state minimums just don’t cut it if you want to avoid a nasty surprise. Peace of mind’s worth a few extra bucks a month, at least for me.


Reply
trebel98
Posts: 19
(@trebel98)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I’ll admit I’ve dragged my feet on upping my limits for years. Part of it’s stubbornness—my old Chevelle isn’t exactly packed with sensors or fancy tech, so repairs are usually more about elbow grease than electronics. But even I have to admit, the roads are full of $60k SUVs and EVs now, and a “minor” scrape can mean thousands in damage.

Had a buddy rear-end a new BMW last summer—barely a dent on his car, but the other guy’s rear camera and parking sensors got fried. Insurance barely covered half after the deductible and he was on the hook for the rest. That was a wake-up call.

I still think there’s a line between sensible coverage and getting fleeced by the insurance companies, but these days, state minimums feel like playing roulette. Peace of mind’s worth something, especially when you’re sharing the road with cars that cost more than some houses did when I was a kid...


Reply
Page 67 / 123
Share:
Scroll to Top