Notifications
Clear all

Sneaky Auto Insurance Exclusions You Might've Missed

126 Posts
123 Users
0 Reactions
608 Views
running707
Posts: 3
(@running707)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, totally agree—insurers aren't exactly eager to point out loopholes. I usually jot down specific scenarios beforehand and ask directly about coverage for those. Helps cut through the vague answers and reveals exclusions they might gloss over otherwise...

Reply
collector82
Posts: 7
(@collector82)
Active Member
Joined:

"I usually jot down specific scenarios beforehand and ask directly about coverage for those."

Smart move. I remember years ago, my buddy assumed his insurance covered any driver borrowing his car—until his cousin got into a fender bender. Turns out, family wasn't automatically included... insurers can be sneaky like that.

Reply
Posts: 8
(@surfing_mocha)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, asking specifics is definitely the way to go. Ever checked if your policy covers hitting wildlife? I assumed mine did until a deer jumped out last fall... turns out it was only covered under comprehensive, not collision. Had to pay out-of-pocket for repairs. Insurance companies love their fine print—makes me wonder what else I'm missing. Anyone actually read through their entire policy lately?

Reply
Posts: 5
(@joshuap32)
Active Member
Joined:

Good point—wildlife collisions are almost always comprehensive, not collision. Another sneaky one is flood damage. A buddy of mine found out the hard way after a storm flooded his street... turns out standard auto policies usually exclude water damage from flooding unless you've specifically got comprehensive coverage. Definitely worth double-checking your policy details, especially if you're in an area prone to heavy rains or storms.

Reply
sandracyclotourist
Posts: 4
(@sandracyclotourist)
Active Member
Joined:

I get what you're saying, but honestly, comprehensive coverage isn't always the no-brainer people make it out to be. When I first started driving, my dad insisted I get comprehensive because of all these horror stories about deer and floods. But after a year of paying extra, I did the math and realized I'd shelled out way more than my old beater was even worth. And when I finally did hit a raccoon (poor little guy...), the deductible was so high it wasn't even worth filing a claim.

So yeah, comprehensive covers a lot of sneaky stuff, but sometimes it's just not practical—especially if your car isn't worth much. Better to stash that extra cash into savings for repairs or a replacement down the line. Just my two cents from someone who's been there.

Reply
Page 3 / 26
Share:
Scroll to Top