Notifications
Clear all

How is ACV not just a fancy way to pay us less?

109 Posts
103 Users
0 Reactions
694 Views
sblizzard48
Posts: 8
(@sblizzard48)
Active Member
Joined:

I get that’s how the policy reads, but honestly, it still feels like a loophole for insurers to pay out less. If I put $2k into mods and have receipts, why shouldn’t that count? Just seems like a convenient technicality for them.


Reply
yogi90
Posts: 14
(@yogi90)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, it does kinda feel like a technicality, doesn’t it? I get why it’s frustrating—especially when you’ve got receipts and everything. The thing is, most policies only cover mods if you specifically add them to your coverage, which is honestly pretty easy to miss in the fine print. I’ve seen people surprised by this all the time. It’s not really about trying to pay out less, it’s more that the base policy just doesn’t see those extras unless you tell it to. Still, I agree, it feels weird when you’ve put real money into your ride and it’s just... invisible.


Reply
pauljournalist
Posts: 10
(@pauljournalist)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, it really comes down to what’s actually listed on your policy. I’ve had folks come in pretty upset after a claim, thinking all their upgrades were just “part of the car.” Have you ever tried adding mods to your policy before, or did you just assume they’d be covered?


Reply
history2848128
Posts: 5
(@history2848128)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve always been a little paranoid about that, honestly. When I got my car, I double-checked with my agent to see if my aftermarket stereo would be covered, and turns out, it wasn’t unless I listed it specifically. Kind of a wake-up call. Has anyone actually had a claim denied because they forgot to list something? Or is it more of a rare thing? I just feel like insurance companies look for any reason to pay less...


Reply
Page 22 / 22
Share:
Scroll to Top