Notifications
Clear all

Roadside help added to my insurance—totally worth it?

266 Posts
250 Users
0 Reactions
10.5 K Views
simba_explorer
Posts: 10
(@simba_explorer)
Active Member
Joined:

One thing I’d add: some insurance roadside plans also cap the number of miles they’ll tow you, and it’s usually less than what standalone services offer. That can be a pain if you break down ...

That “main road” clause has tripped up a lot of folks, especially if you’re into backroads or classic car rallies. I’ve had similar issues—insurance roadside just isn’t built for anything off the beaten path. AAA or Hagerty’s plans have saved me more than once when my old Mustang decided it was done for the day. The mileage cap is another big one; I’ve seen some policies only cover 5-10 miles, which barely gets you to a decent shop if you’re out in the country. For those of us who drive older cars or like to wander, the extra perks and flexibility from standalone plans are hard to beat.


Reply
Posts: 24
(@gdiver13)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, I’ve seen folks get caught out by those fine print details—especially the “main road” thing. Had a buddy with an old Bronco stuck on a forest service road and his insurance plan was basically useless. I get why people like the standalone plans, but for city drivers or folks who stick to highways, the basic insurance add-on can still be a solid, budget-friendly choice. Just gotta know what you’re getting into before you need it...


Reply
sroberts23
Posts: 26
(@sroberts23)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Just gotta know what you’re getting into before you need it...

- 100% agree on reading the fine print.
- For daily highway commutes, the basic add-on has saved me a couple times—flat tire, dead battery, nothing wild.
- If you’re not off-roading or hitting remote areas, the budget option makes sense.
- Still, I always double-check coverage every renewal... those “main road” exclusions can sneak up on you.


Reply
news828
Posts: 21
(@news828)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Not sure I’d call the budget option a no-brainer, even for city or highway driving. I’ve seen folks get stuck with a “basic” plan and end up paying out of pocket because the tow distance was capped at like 5 miles—barely gets you off the interstate, let alone to a decent shop. And some of those main road exclusions are sneakier than they look... had a claim last month where a guy broke down on a frontage road and it wasn’t covered. He was not happy.

I get wanting to save a few bucks, but sometimes the mid-tier plan is worth it just for the peace of mind. Especially if you’re driving older cars or commuting at weird hours. The fine print is everything, but sometimes it’s just not as “basic” as it sounds.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@surfing_william)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve seen folks get stuck with a “basic” plan and end up paying out of pocket because the tow distance was capped at like 5 miles—barely gets you off the interstate, let alone to a decent shop.

That’s exactly the issue I ran into a couple years back. My car had a sensor failure on the highway, and the “included” tow barely got me to the nearest gas station, not even a proper service center. Ended up paying a hefty extra fee just to get it to a shop that could actually handle the repairs. It’s frustrating, especially when you think you’re covered.

I do think the mid-tier or premium plans make more sense if you’re driving something that’s expensive to fix or not easily serviced. The cost difference is usually pretty minor compared to what you’d pay out of pocket for a long tow or specialized help. And those exclusions—frontage roads, private lots, even some parking garages—can be a real headache. I’d rather pay a bit more upfront than risk being stranded somewhere inconvenient.

It’s not just about saving money, either. For me, it’s the peace of mind knowing I won’t have to argue with a claims rep at 2am if something goes wrong. The fine print really does matter more than most people realize.


Reply
Page 34 / 54
Share:
Scroll to Top