Notifications
Clear all

My insurance nightmare in Rhode Island traffic court

261 Posts
242 Users
0 Reactions
2,012 Views
Posts: 7
(@cathy_tail)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, those classic car policies sound good on paper, but once you read the fine print, it’s a whole different story. I tried to go that route with my old pickup, thinking I’d save a bunch, but between the “approved storage” and the annual mileage cap, it just wasn’t worth the hassle. Like, what’s the point of owning something fun if you’re paranoid about taking it out for a spin?

Honestly, I’d rather pay a bit more and not have to jump through hoops every time I want to drive. Plus, if you ever get caught in a fender bender and they find out you weren’t following their rules to the letter... good luck with that claim.

Curious though—has anyone actually managed to make those policies work long-term without headaches? Or is it just not doable unless you truly only drive your classic to shows and back?


Reply
robertsnorkeler
Posts: 12
(@robertsnorkeler)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s a pretty common frustration, honestly. Those classic car policies can look like a steal until you realize how strict the requirements are. The mileage limits and storage conditions aren’t just suggestions—they’re usually dealbreakers for people who want to actually drive their cars, not just polish them in the garage. I’ve seen a few folks make it work, but they tend to be the types who treat their classics almost like museum pieces.

One thing I always wonder is how many people actually read through all those limitations before signing up. It’s easy to get caught up in the lower premiums and miss the part where your coverage could be voided if you take a spontaneous road trip or park somewhere that isn’t “approved.” Have you ever tried negotiating with an insurer for a more flexible policy, or did you just give up on the whole idea after seeing the fine print? Sometimes there’s a little wiggle room, but it really depends on the company and how much risk they’re willing to take on.


Reply
jackh57
Posts: 14
(@jackh57)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I learned the hard way—those “classic” policies are a trap if you actually want to drive the thing. I got burned after taking my old Mustang out for a weekend trip. Turns out, that one extra overnight at a friend’s place technically voided my coverage. Tried arguing with the agent, but they wouldn’t budge. These companies love dangling those cheap rates, but they know most people won’t read the fine print. At this point, I’d rather pay more and not worry every time I leave the driveway.


Reply
vlogger11
Posts: 10
(@vlogger11)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you're coming from, but I gotta admit, I’ve had the opposite experience with classic car insurance. Yeah, the restrictions are a pain—like, you can’t just take your car on a spontaneous road trip without double-checking—but that’s kinda the trade-off for those low rates. I’ve saved a ton over the years by sticking to their rules, which honestly isn’t that hard for me since my old Chevy mostly sits in the garage anyway.

Not saying you’re wrong about the fine print—insurance companies definitely love their loopholes—but I dunno if paying way more for regular coverage is always worth it unless you’re really driving your classic all the time. For me, it’s just about knowing what you’re signing up for and playing by their weird rules. Annoying? Sure. But my wallet’s happier for it... at least so far.


Reply
animator67
Posts: 5
(@animator67)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, I get that. With my old Porsche, I ran into similar restrictions—couldn’t even take it to a cars and coffee without checking the policy first. It’s a hassle, but honestly, the savings are real if you’re not daily driving. Still, I’ve always worried about what happens if you bend the rules just a little... insurance companies aren’t exactly forgiving. Guess it’s all about how much you actually want to use the car versus just admiring it in the garage.


Reply
Page 35 / 53
Share:
Scroll to Top