Notifications
Clear all

SCORED A SWEET DEAL ON INSURANCE THANKS TO MILITARY DISCOUNT

331 Posts
316 Users
0 Reactions
3,064 Views
AutoSafe_84
Posts: 14
(@autosafe_84)
Active Member
Joined:

- I get the appeal of bundling, but honestly, I’ve had better luck splitting coverage. My last claim with a “luxury” insurer was way smoother than when everything was bundled—no waiting on hold forever. Maybe it’s just luck, but sometimes paying a bit more for specialized service is worth it... especially if you’re picky about repairs.


Reply
dvortex95
Posts: 10
(@dvortex95)
Active Member
Joined:

sometimes paying a bit more for specialized service is worth it... especially if you’re picky about repairs.

Totally get where you’re coming from. I’ve seen folks who split their auto and home coverage swear by the faster claims process, especially with niche or “luxury” carriers. Had a client once who was super particular about OEM parts—her standalone policy actually got her a direct line to the adjuster, no endless phone trees. Bundling’s great for discounts, but yeah, sometimes that extra attention is worth the premium.


Reply
mwhiskers15
Posts: 9
(@mwhiskers15)
Active Member
Joined:

her standalone policy actually got her a direct line to the adjuster, no endless phone trees.

- That direct access is a game-changer for some. Not everyone has the patience for call centers, especially when stuff hits the fan.
- Curious—did you find any downside to splitting policies versus bundling? Like, did it make billing or renewals a hassle?
- Sometimes I wonder if the “luxury” carriers really deliver on those faster claims, or if it’s just good marketing. Anyone ever had a high-end policy and still got stuck in the queue?


Reply
cwright32
Posts: 16
(@cwright32)
Active Member
Joined:

Title: SCORED A SWEET DEAL ON INSURANCE THANKS TO MILITARY DISCOUNT

Direct line to an adjuster sounds dreamy compared to the “press 1 for English, then wait 45 minutes” routine. I’ve only ever had bundled policies because I thought it was supposed to be cheaper and less paperwork, but now I’m wondering if I’m missing out. I did have one year where my auto and renters were with different companies, and honestly, the billing wasn’t a nightmare, but it did mean two logins, two sets of emails, and twice the junk mail. Not the end of the world, but kinda annoying.

About those so-called luxury carriers—had one for a while (my dad insisted on it for “peace of mind,” whatever that means). They were quick when it came to answering the phone, but when I actually needed them after a fender bender, it was still a week before anyone looked at my car. Maybe it’s better than average? Hard to say. Felt like a regular wait to me, just with fancier hold music and a rep who called me “sir” a lot. Not sure if that’s worth the extra money.

Honestly, I’d rather have decent service and keep my discount than pay more for the “VIP” experience that’s not all that VIP. Especially with military discounts in play—those can stack up fast. At the end of the day, as long as I can avoid being on hold forever and don’t have to jump through flaming hoops just to get reimbursed, I’m happy.

Maybe the secret is just finding a company that doesn’t treat you like a number... or at least gives you a number that actually works.


Reply
cherylgamer76
Posts: 3
(@cherylgamer76)
New Member
Joined:

Bundling always seemed like the obvious choice to me too, but lately I’ve noticed some companies actually offer better rates if you split things up—especially with those military discounts. Has anyone here ever had a claim denied or delayed just because they weren’t bundled? That’s my only real worry.


Reply
Page 65 / 67
Share:
Scroll to Top