Notifications
Clear all

stuck between Geico and Progressive in NY, thoughts?

858 Posts
737 Users
0 Reactions
40.9 K Views
barbarah69
Posts: 22
(@barbarah69)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I totally get the hesitation with those tracking programs. I had a client last year who tried Progressive’s Snapshot in Brooklyn—she’s a cautious driver, but the app dinged her for every hard brake and weird traffic move, even when it wasn’t her fault. She ended up frustrated and didn’t save much. Geico’s more hands-off approach does seem to suit city life better, especially if you value not being “watched” every time you drive. Sometimes, paying a little more for less hassle is worth it.


Reply
timgamerdev
Posts: 22
(@timgamerdev)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Geico’s more hands-off approach does seem to suit city life better, especially if you value not being “watched” every time you drive.

Yeah, city driving is unpredictable—someone cuts you off and suddenly the app thinks you’re reckless. I’ve seen people get penalized for stuff totally out of their control. Sometimes it’s just not worth chasing those tiny discounts if it means extra stress. Geico’s rates are steady and you know what to expect, which can be a relief if you’re on a tight budget.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@andrew_writer)
Active Member
Joined:

Totally get where you’re coming from with the unpredictability of city driving. I tried Progressive’s Snapshot for a few months and honestly, it just made me more anxious behind the wheel. I’d be extra cautious, but then someone would slam on their brakes in front of me or a cyclist would dart out, and boom—my “safe driver” score took a hit. It almost felt like the app was punishing me for just existing in NYC traffic.

With Geico, I at least know what my payment will be each month. That’s huge when you’re juggling family expenses and can’t have your insurance bill randomly spike because of stuff you couldn’t control. The “set it and forget it” factor is underrated, especially if you’re not into micromanaging every aspect of your driving.

One thing I’ll say, though—Progressive did give me a lower initial quote, but once they started factoring in the Snapshot data, my rate crept up. It was frustrating because it felt like I was being penalized for things that weren’t my fault. Maybe if you mostly drive late at night or in the suburbs, the app works out better, but in the city? Not so much.

Also, with kids in the car, there’s enough going on without worrying if my insurance company is grading my every move. I’d rather focus on keeping everyone safe than stress about every sudden stop or honk.

Not saying Geico’s perfect, but for city families who want predictable costs and less hassle, it makes a lot more sense. Just my two cents after bouncing between both.


Reply
zeus_johnson
Posts: 18
(@zeus_johnson)
Active Member
Joined:

Been there, done that—Snapshot and I were not a good match. I swear, the thing dinged me every time a cab cut me off or someone double-parked in front of me. Felt like I was being graded on a pop quiz I never signed up for. Geico’s predictability is underrated, honestly. At least when my wallet takes a hit, I know why... not because some delivery guy decided to test his brakes in front of me. City driving’s wild enough without big brother riding shotgun.


Reply
Posts: 20
(@bearp66)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from. Those telematics things sound great in theory, but in NYC traffic? It’s like they expect you to drive in a bubble. I’ve been researching both companies and Geico’s straightforward pricing is appealing—at least you know what you’re paying for. Progressive’s discounts look tempting, but if it means stressing over every sudden stop, I’m not sure it’s worth it. I’d rather budget for a set rate than gamble on tech that can’t tell the difference between my driving and someone else’s chaos.


Reply
Page 91 / 172
Share:
Scroll to Top