Insurance fine print is like a maze—never know what you’ll find in there.
That’s the truth. I had a situation where my buddy borrowed my car for a weekend trip, and even though he was “permissive use,” the insurance tried to wiggle out of covering a cracked windshield because he wasn’t listed. It worked out in the end, but it was way more hassle than it should’ve been. Ever since then, if someone’s driving my car more than once or twice, I just add them. Not worth the stress.
I hear you on the “permissive use” headache. It sounds so straightforward in theory—your policy covers someone you let drive, end of story. But then you get into the weeds, and suddenly there’s a million little exceptions and technicalities. I’ve seen people get tripped up over things like whether the friend was a regular driver or just a one-off, or even if the trip was considered “business” instead of personal use. It’s wild how much hangs on the wording.
Honestly, I lean toward adding folks if they’re going to be behind the wheel more than just once in a blue moon. It’s usually not a huge bump in premium, and it saves a ton of stress if something does go sideways. That said, I know some people think it’s overkill, especially if their friends are super careful drivers or only use the car in emergencies. But insurance companies are always looking for reasons to deny a claim, and “not a listed driver” is one of their favorites.
Funny enough, I had a client who let his brother borrow his truck to move apartments—literally just a few hours—and wouldn’t you know it, a deer ran out and smashed the front end. The claim took weeks to sort out because the brother wasn’t on the policy, even though he had permission. In the end, it was covered, but only after a ton of back-and-forth and paperwork.
Curious if anyone’s ever had an insurer actually flat-out deny a claim over permissive use? Or is it usually just a paperwork nightmare that eventually gets sorted? I always wonder if the hassle is just part of the process, or if there are cases where people really get left out to dry.
Had a similar experience last year—my cousin borrowed my car for a Target run, ended up in a fender bender in the parking lot. I figured, “no big deal, he had my okay,” but it turned into a paperwork mess.
-
Totally agree. The insurance company wanted to know if he was a “regular” driver or just a one-off. Took almost a month to get sorted, and I had to dig up texts proving it was just a favor.“It’s wild how much hangs on the wording.”
Never had a flat-out denial, but the hassle alone made me start adding anyone who might drive more than once. Not worth the headache otherwise, even if it costs a bit more.
Had a buddy borrow my Outback for a weekend camping trip—nothing wild, just up north and back. I figured it was fine since he’s a careful driver, but of course, he got rear-ended at a stoplight. Insurance grilled me on whether he was a “regular” or if this was a one-off, and honestly, it was a huge pain trying to explain he’d only driven it once before. They eventually covered it, but the back-and-forth was ridiculous.
Since then, I’ve just added anyone who might drive my car more than once or twice. It’s not cheap, but compared to the stress? Worth it. The whole “permissive use” thing sounds simple until you’re stuck arguing over what counts as “regular.” Feels like a loophole waiting to bite you if you’re not super careful with the details.
