Notifications
Clear all

ever wonder if gap coverage is worth it up here?

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
167 Views
simba_echo
Posts: 28
Topic starter
(@simba_echo)
Eminent Member
Joined:

So I was chatting with my buddy yesterday, and he told me this wild story about his cousin in Maine. Dude bought a brand new truck, shiny and everything, and then bam—hit a deer like two weeks later. Insurance covered most of it, but apparently he still owed a chunk of cash because of depreciation or something. Got me thinking...is gap coverage actually worth it around here, especially with all the moose and deer wandering around? Curious what you guys think.


4 Replies
meganm85
Posts: 13
(@meganm85)
Active Member
Joined:

Gap coverage can definitely be worth it, especially if you're financing something brand new. Depreciation hits hardest in the first couple years, and that's exactly when gap insurance kicks in. Even if you're a careful driver, wildlife collisions around here are just part of the deal. A friend of mine had a similar situation—new SUV, deer jumped out, and insurance payout didn't cover the full loan balance. He ended up paying almost two grand out of pocket. Personally, I stick to older classics, so gap coverage isn't really a factor for me—but if I were buying new, I'd seriously consider it. It's basically cheap peace of mind considering how unpredictable things can get around these parts.


Reply
marley_biker
Posts: 21
(@marley_biker)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I've always been a bit skeptical about gap coverage myself, mostly because I figured it was just another way for dealerships to squeeze extra cash out of you. But reading your friend's deer story makes me reconsider a bit. I mean, I'm not exactly the poster child for safe driving—had my share of close calls with moose and icy roads around here. Couple winters back, I slid off the road into a ditch, totaled my car, and insurance barely covered what I owed. Ended up paying out of pocket for months after that mess.

Still, part of me wonders if gap coverage is really worth it for everyone or just folks buying brand-new rides. Like, does it make sense if you're financing something that's already a year or two old? Or is depreciation less brutal by then? Curious if anyone's had experience with gap coverage on slightly used vehicles...


Reply
Posts: 26
(@kimmeow606)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Had similar doubts myself when I bought my first used car last year. Did some digging and here's what I found:

- Gap coverage is most beneficial when your loan balance is higher than the car's actual value (common with new cars due to rapid depreciation).
- For slightly used vehicles, depreciation slows down a bit, but it doesn't vanish completely—especially if you're financing long-term.
- If your down payment was small or your loan term is lengthy, gap coverage can still save you from a nasty surprise.

Given your past experience sliding into that ditch...might be worth the peace of mind.


Reply
simba_echo
Posts: 28
Topic starter
(@simba_echo)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Did some digging and here's what I found:

- Gap coverage is most beneficial when your loan balance is higher than the car's actual value (common with new cars due to rapid depreciation). - For sli...

The points above are pretty spot-on. From a claims perspective, I've seen plenty of cases where gap coverage saved folks from paying thousands out of pocket. Especially true if you're financing brand new vehicles or going with minimal down payments. Deer and moose collisions can total a car surprisingly easily, and standard insurance payouts rarely match loan balances in those early years. Considering your buddy's experience, I'd say gap coverage is more practical than most people realize.


Reply
Share:
Scroll to Top