Notifications
Clear all

just saw a story about a guy in Kansas whose car got totaled by hail, and turns out his insurance didn't cover it.

1,055 Posts
900 Users
0 Reactions
51.1 K Views
mindfulness330
Posts: 12
(@mindfulness330)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, gotta agree with you there. Most folks just skim the basics and assume they're good to go. I learned that lesson the hard way myself a few years back—thought my comprehensive coverage had me covered for everything until a branch fell on my hood during a storm. Turns out there was some fine print about "acts of nature" exclusions. Cost me a pretty penny out of pocket.

Ever since then, I make it a point to grill my insurance agent about specifics. It's annoying, sure, but better than getting blindsided later. My advice: don't just glance at the summary page. Ask directly about hail, flooding, falling objects, and anything else common in your area. Make them spell it out clearly. If they can't or won't, might be time to shop around...


Reply
Posts: 16
(@brewer48)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, good call on grilling your agent. A few years ago, my windshield got cracked by a chunk of ice flying off a truck ahead of me—figured comprehensive would handle it, right? Nope. Apparently, my policy had some weird clause about "road debris" being excluded. Ever since then, I've gotten pretty obsessive about reading the fine print. It's tedious, sure, but beats getting stuck footing the bill later...


Reply
Posts: 16
(@gardener726042)
Active Member
Joined:

"Ever since then, I've gotten pretty obsessive about reading the fine print."

Can't blame you there. Policies can be sneaky with those exclusions. A client of mine had a similar wake-up call last summer—hailstorm wrecked his car, and turns out his comprehensive coverage had a specific hail exclusion because he'd opted for a cheaper premium. Always worth double-checking if you're in an area prone to certain weather events...sometimes saving a few bucks upfront can cost way more down the road.


Reply
mochagamerpro
Posts: 29
(@mochagamerpro)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yikes, that's exactly why I'm paranoid about these cheaper premiums. Had a similar scare myself a couple years ago—almost switched policies because the quote was so tempting, but luckily I took the time to dig through all that fine print. Turns out the cheaper one didn't cover flood damage, and we live near a creek that likes to overflow every spring...no thanks. I'd rather pay a bit more each month than gamble on Mother Nature behaving herself.

Honestly, insurance companies know exactly what they're doing with those exclusions. They're betting we won't read all that tiny text or think about worst-case scenarios. But when something actually happens, that's when you realize how much those few extra bucks per month are worth. Learned my lesson without having to file a claim (thank goodness), but stories like this remind me why being overly cautious isn't always a bad thing!


Reply
gadgeteer55
Posts: 25
(@gadgeteer55)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Yeah, good catch on that flood coverage—it's easy to overlook stuff like hail or floods until it's too late. Ever thought about chatting with your agent to double-check other sneaky exclusions? Might save you another headache down the road...


Reply
Page 6 / 211
Share:
Scroll to Top