Notifications
Clear all

just saw a story about a guy in Kansas whose car got totaled by hail, and turns out his insurance didn't cover it.

1,055 Posts
900 Users
0 Reactions
37.5 K Views
Posts: 10
(@donnagolfplayer)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I kinda think it’s on us to read the fine print, even if it sucks. Like, yeah, insurance is confusing, but they do give you the paperwork. I learned the hard way when my bumper got wrecked and “full coverage” didn’t mean what I thought. Now I just ask straight up—no shame.


Reply
diyer968937
Posts: 9
(@diyer968937)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly, it feels like “full coverage” is just marketing speak half the time. I remember thinking I was set, then hit a deer last winter and found out my deductible was way higher than I realized. It’s wild how many little details are buried in those policies. Now, I make a point to ask about every scenario I can think of—hail, theft, you name it. It’s a pain, but better than getting burned later.


Reply
michael_martin
Posts: 9
(@michael_martin)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, “full coverage” really trips people up. I’ve lost count of the times someone thought they were covered for everything, only to find out later that things like hail or animal collisions fall under comprehensive, not just the basic package. I once had a neighbor who was shocked his “full” policy didn’t cover a tree branch falling on his car during a storm. The fine print gets folks every time. Asking about those weird scenarios definitely saves headaches down the road.


Reply
christopher_wright
Posts: 8
(@christopher_wright)
Active Member
Joined:

Been there myself—thought my “full” coverage would handle a deer collision, but nope, that was a separate thing. It’s wild how the wording gets you. You’re right to dig into those details before signing anything. Better safe than sorry.


Reply
Posts: 19
(@michellet51)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying about digging into the details, but honestly, sometimes I think the insurance companies make it confusing on purpose. “Full coverage” should mean just that, right? But then you find out about all these exceptions—like animal collisions being separate, or hail damage not being covered unless you have comprehensive. It almost feels like a game of gotcha.

I’ve started to wonder if it’s really possible to catch every little thing in those policies. Last year, I spent an hour on the phone with my agent just trying to figure out if hitting a pothole would be covered (spoiler: depends on the policy). Makes me wish there was just a checklist or something simple instead of all this legal jargon.

On the road, I try to prep for everything—first aid kit, extra snacks, even duct tape—but insurance? That one’s still a gamble no matter how careful you are.


Reply
Page 146 / 211
Share:
Scroll to Top