Notifications
Clear all

Deductibles and premiums—what's the real deal?

236 Posts
227 Users
0 Reactions
11.5 K Views
Posts: 9
(@john_moore9298)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I hear this a lot—tech in cars is a blessing and a curse, right? The tiniest accident can set you back way more than you’d think. Have you ever looked at how much those sensors cost to replace? It’s wild. Sometimes people don’t realize that “saving” on premiums can mean gambling with your emergency fund. But then again, if someone hardly drives or has an older car, maybe the higher deductible makes sense for them. Curious if anyone’s actually come out ahead picking the high-deductible route...


Reply
vlogger58
Posts: 21
(@vlogger58)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I’ve run the numbers a few times, and with my car, the high-deductible route just doesn’t add up. The tech is so expensive to fix—one parking sensor got clipped and it was almost $900 out of pocket. Sure, I could save a bit on premiums, but one minor mishap wipes out years of “savings.” Maybe it’s different if you’re driving something simpler or older, but for newer models loaded with gadgets, is anyone really coming out ahead? Or am I just being too cautious?


Reply
rockyvolunteer
Posts: 23
(@rockyvolunteer)
Eminent Member
Joined:

The tech is so expensive to fix—one parking sensor got clipped and it was almost $900 out of pocket.

Yeah, I hear you. With all the sensors and cameras on newer cars, even a tiny fender bender can get pricey fast. Here’s how I look at it:

1. Add up your annual premium savings with a higher deductible.
2. Compare that to the cost of one repair (like your $900 sensor).
3. Factor in how likely you are to need a repair in the next few years.

For me, the math just doesn’t work out either. I’d rather pay a bit more each month and avoid a nasty surprise if something goes wrong. Maybe if you’re driving an old beater, it’s worth the gamble... but with new tech-heavy cars? Not convinced.


Reply
Posts: 15
(@matthewrobinson380)
Active Member
Joined:

With all the sensors and cameras on newer cars, even a tiny fender bender can get pricey fast.

That’s exactly why I stick to my old ‘72 Chevelle for daily driving. No sensors, no cameras—just steel and chrome. Had a minor scrape last year, and fixing it was basically just hammering out the dent and a bit of touch-up paint. Parts are cheap, labor’s straightforward. I get why folks love the new tech, but man, the repair bills are wild compared to classic rides. Sometimes simpler really is better... at least for my wallet.


Reply
Posts: 19
(@oreowhiskers345)
Active Member
Joined:

Can’t blame you for sticking with the Chevelle. My buddy’s got an older truck and swears by the same logic—simple fixes, no surprise costs. I get tempted by all the new safety stuff, but man, those repair quotes are a gut punch. Sometimes old-school just makes sense, even if it means giving up the fancy screens.


Reply
Page 17 / 48
Share:
Scroll to Top