Car insurance discussions and local services.

Figuring out if you really need comprehensive coverage

2 replies 214 views
 
finnjournalist Original post
13 posts
Discussion options
Discussion options
RSS
[#334]

I've been helping my younger brother sort out his first car insurance policy, and we got stuck on the whole comprehensive coverage thing. At first, he was like "nah, I don't need that," because his car isn't exactly a shiny new Tesla or anything - it's more like a gently used (okay, heavily loved) Honda Civic. But then I reminded him about stuff like theft, vandalism, or even random tree branches deciding to take a nap on your windshield during a storm.

Anyway, here's the tip I gave him: if your car's value is pretty low - like under $3k or so - it might not be worth paying extra for comprehensive coverage. You could end up paying more in premiums than you'd ever get back if something happened. But if your ride is newer or you live somewhere sketchy (or just have really bad luck with trees), it might be worth it.

Curious how other folks decide whether to go comprehensive or skip it...any rules of thumb or personal experiences?


2 replies

birdwatcher88
10 posts

That $3k cutoff is only a rough guide. Compare the annual comprehensive premium plus the deductible with the car’s current market value, not what you originally paid for it. If a $2,500 car costs $300 a year to insure comprehensively and carries a $1,000 deductible, the maximum realistic payout is already pretty limited. Check the policy’s actual valuation method too, since it may pay market value rather than replacement cost.

The important exception is financing. A lender will usually require comprehensive and collision coverage for the life of the loan, even if dropping them looks sensible on paper. Removing it could violate the loan agreement and leave you responsible for the balance after theft or a total loss.


Reply
geek_kevin
17 posts

The $1,000 deductible example may look decisive, but I’d also check whether glass claims have their own deductible. Some policies treat windshield damage separately, with a much lower deductible or even full glass coverage, while others apply the standard comprehensive deductible. That can matter if a $2,500 car is likely to need a windshield replacement even though theft or storm damage would barely justify a claim. Is the glass deductible clearly listed in the policy, or buried in the endorsements?


Reply

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

Scroll to Top