Notifications
Clear all

Why California’s minimum car insurance might not be enough

659 Posts
615 Users
0 Reactions
19.9 K Views
Posts: 12
(@joshuahistorian)
Active Member
Joined:

That $5k property damage limit? You could hit a parked Prius and blow past that in a heartbeat. Doesn’t even take a luxury car.

Man, you’re not kidding. I once had a client tap a Tesla in a parking lot—barely left a mark, but the repair bill was almost $9k. He thought his “full coverage” (which was just the state minimum) had his back. Spoiler: it didn’t. I get why folks gamble on the minimum—money’s tight, and insurance feels like paying for something you hope never happens. But when it does... ouch. Still, I’ll admit, some people just can’t squeeze out more each month, and that’s rough too.


Reply
bexplorer58
Posts: 17
(@bexplorer58)
Active Member
Joined:

That $5k limit is wild when you think about how much even a minor fender bender can cost these days. I had a buddy who sideswiped a Camry—nothing fancy, just a regular old sedan—and the bill was over $6k after all was said and done. Paint sensors, cameras, who knows what else... it adds up fast. He thought he was being smart by keeping his insurance cheap, but ended up paying out of pocket for the difference.

I get the struggle, though. When you’re choosing between groceries and bumping up your coverage, it’s not exactly an easy call. Still, I’d rather skip a couple lattes a month than risk getting stuck with a bill that could wipe out my savings. Not saying everyone can swing it, but sometimes those “what are the odds?” moments come back to bite you.


Reply
benbuilder6925
Posts: 7
(@benbuilder6925)
Active Member
Joined:

That story about your friend is exactly what’s been stressing me out as I shop around for my first policy. I keep looking at that $5k property damage minimum and thinking, “Is this number from 1992 or what?” Like, have you seen the price of taillights these days? Never mind if you hit something with a backup camera or those fancy sensors—suddenly you’re paying more to fix a bumper than some people spend on a vacation.

“He thought he was being smart by keeping his insurance cheap, but ended up paying out of pocket for the difference.”

That’s what really gets me. I mean, yeah, it’s tempting to take the lowest premium when you’re already stretching every dollar. But the idea of saving a few bucks now and then getting slammed with a bill that could take years to pay off... I don’t know, it just doesn’t add up for me. I’d rather cut back somewhere else (maybe skip the fancy oat milk in my coffee) than risk owing thousands because I tried to save $10 a month.

I get that not everyone can just bump up their coverage without feeling it. But honestly, even as someone who’s never had to file a claim, the “what are the odds?” argument doesn’t really hold up anymore. The odds seem way too high when you realize how expensive even minor accidents are now.

It’s kind of wild how the law hasn’t kept up with reality here. $5k barely covers a fender bender, let alone anything serious. Makes me wonder how many people out there think they’re protected and are actually one unlucky day away from major debt.


Reply
Posts: 14
(@tobyb65)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, $5k is a joke. I drive a car where one scratch on the bumper can run $2k easy—don’t even get me started on what a cracked sensor costs. I get that not everyone’s rolling around in a luxury ride, but even a regular Honda or Toyota isn’t cheap to fix these days.

-

“the idea of saving a few bucks now and then getting slammed with a bill that could take years to pay off... I don’t know, it just doesn’t add up for me.”
Couldn’t agree more. Saving $10/month on your premium isn’t worth the risk. One dumb mistake and you’re on the hook for thousands.

- Laws are way behind. $5k might have worked when bumpers were chrome and you could fix them with a hammer. Now? Hit a parked Tesla and you’ll wish you’d just bought a bus pass.

- Even if you’re careful, you can’t control what happens out there. All it takes is one distracted driver or a tight parking lot.

I’d rather pay for coverage than gamble with my savings. The peace of mind is worth it, oat milk or not.


Reply
Posts: 11
(@comics396)
Active Member
Joined:

Couldn’t agree more about the repair costs—modern cars are basically computers on wheels, and even a minor fender bender can spiral into a huge bill. I get why some folks want to save a bit on premiums, but honestly, the risk just isn’t worth it for most people. I’ve seen too many people shocked by what “minimum” really covers when something goes sideways. It’s just not the place to cut corners these days.


Reply
Page 59 / 132
Share:
Scroll to Top