Notifications
Clear all

Why California’s minimum car insurance might not be enough

625 Posts
583 Users
0 Reactions
10.6 K Views
jackshadow12
Posts: 3
(@jackshadow12)
New Member
Joined:

It really does feel like a gamble, but after I got rear-ended last year and the other driver had no insurance, I was stuck with way more out-of-pocket than I expected. The monthly jump for extra coverage stings, but honestly, one accident can wipe out years of “savings.” It’s tough, but I’d rather pay a bit more now than get blindsided by a huge repair bill later. California’s minimums just don’t go very far anymore.


Reply
marleyb73
Posts: 15
(@marleyb73)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on that—California’s minimums really haven’t kept up with the cost of repairs or medical bills. I remember when $15,000 for bodily injury seemed like plenty, but these days, even a minor accident can run up a bill way past that. I’ve always carried higher limits just for peace of mind, but it does sting every month when the premium comes out.

One thing I’ve wondered about is uninsured motorist coverage—did you have that at the time? It’s not required, but it’s saved me once before when someone hit my parked car and just took off. I know some folks skip it to save money, but after seeing how many drivers are uninsured or underinsured around here, I’m not sure it’s worth the risk.

Curious if anyone’s actually found a sweet spot where they feel covered but aren’t overpaying? The balance is tricky, especially with rates going up every year...


Reply
Posts: 6
(@design580)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on those premiums—mine are sky-high, thanks to a couple tickets and an accident a few years back. I used to think carrying the minimum was enough, but my last fender bender (which, for the record, was not my fault... this time) ended up costing way more than what state minimums would’ve covered. The other driver’s insurance barely scratched the surface, and I got stuck with some ugly bills. That was a wake-up call.

Uninsured motorist coverage is one of those things I never thought I’d need until, surprise, I did. Someone sideswiped me in a parking lot and vanished—I didn’t even get a note. My UM coverage helped out, but my rates still took a hit. Honestly, with how many folks around here are driving without insurance (or with the bare minimum), it feels like rolling the dice every time I get on the freeway.

Finding that sweet spot is tough, especially if you’re already considered “high risk” by the insurers. I try to bump my limits up just enough to avoid disaster, but not so high that I’m eating ramen for dinner every night. For me, 50/100 for liability and matching UM/UIM has been the compromise. It’s not cheap, but after getting burned once, I figure it’s better than draining my savings if something goes sideways.

It’s frustrating that just being responsible ends up costing more. But with repair costs and medical bills what they are now, the old minimums feel like Monopoly money. If anyone’s found a magic formula for decent coverage without breaking the bank, I’d love to hear it... until then, guess I’ll keep dodging potholes and hoping my luck turns around.


Reply
Posts: 9
(@food110)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly, I’m still not convinced that bumping up coverage is always the answer. You mentioned,

“the old minimums feel like Monopoly money.”
Maybe for some folks, but for a lot of us who drive older cars and don’t have much to lose, the minimums are just fine. I’ve been driving in California for almost 30 years—never carried more than the state minimum, and knock on wood, I haven’t been burned yet.

Yeah, medical bills are nuts now, but if you’re not at fault, shouldn’t the other guy’s insurance be on the hook? I know that doesn’t always work out perfectly (hit-and-runs are a nightmare), but I just can’t stomach throwing more money at these companies when they’ll jack up your rates at the drop of a hat anyway.

I get the peace of mind argument, but for me, it’s about risk tolerance. If I had a newer car or a family to worry about, maybe I’d think differently. For now, I’ll take my chances and keep my ramen budget for actual ramen.


Reply
Posts: 2
(@karenmagician)
New Member
Joined:

If I had a newer car or a family to worry about, maybe I’d think differently. For now, I’ll take my chances and keep my ramen budget for actual ramen.

I hear you on the ramen budget—insurance hikes are brutal. But I keep thinking about those “hit-and-runs” you mentioned. Had a buddy who got rear-ended and the guy took off. The minimums barely covered his ER visit, let alone his car. Even with an old beater, medical bills can get wild fast. Sometimes I wonder if paying a bit more now saves a lot of headache later... but yeah, it’s all about what you’re comfortable risking.


Reply
Page 121 / 125
Share:
Scroll to Top