Notifications
Clear all

Confused about insurance rules in South Dakota—help me figure this out

441 Posts
409 Users
0 Reactions
3,511 Views
Posts: 4
(@cathy_tail)
New Member
Joined:

"some insurers might ask for extra documentation or inspections if you've got serious performance upgrades."

Yeah, totally agree with this point. I've found that being proactive really helps smooth things out. When I insured my lightly modded Civic here in SD, I made sure to document everything clearly—photos, receipts, even a quick spreadsheet listing mods and costs. It sounds tedious, but trust me, it saved me a lot of back-and-forth later on. Also, if you're budget-conscious like me, it's worth shopping around a bit more. Progressive was decent for me too, but I found Geico surprisingly flexible about minor mods without hiking premiums much. Just keep in mind that if your mods significantly boost horsepower or handling, some insurers might bump you into a higher-risk category...which can sting your wallet. My advice: keep records handy and don't hesitate to call around—sometimes smaller local agencies can offer better deals or clearer guidelines than the big national companies.

Reply
Posts: 7
(@echow24)
Active Member
Joined:

Good points overall, but I'd add a couple things from my experience:

- Even minor suspension mods (like coilovers or sway bars) can trigger extra scrutiny from some insurers. I had to submit pics of my upgraded suspension setup to State Farm here in SD.
- Ask specifically about coverage limits on aftermarket parts. Some insurers have surprisingly low caps, leaving you out of pocket if something happens.
- Definitely agree on smaller local agencies...they often have clearer answers and fewer hoops to jump through.

Reply
Posts: 7
(@davidj48)
Active Member
Joined:

Interesting points, especially about the aftermarket coverage limits. I learned that lesson the hard way a few years back when I had my '68 Mustang insured through one of the bigger companies. I'd put in a custom interior and upgraded brakes—nothing too crazy, just enough to make it safer and more comfortable for weekend drives. Anyway, after a minor fender-bender (not even my fault), I found out their coverage cap on aftermarket parts was ridiculously low. Ended up paying quite a bit out of pocket to get everything back to how it was.

Since then, I've been extra cautious about reading the fine print and asking detailed questions upfront. Switched over to a smaller local agency here in Rapid City, and they've been way more transparent about what's covered and what's not. They even suggested getting an appraisal done every couple of years to keep the agreed value accurate.

One thing I'm still unsure about though—does anyone know if insurers typically treat classic or vintage cars differently when it comes to mods? Like, would something considered "period-correct" or safety-related (like disc brake conversions) be viewed differently than modern performance upgrades? I've heard mixed things from friends at car meets, but never got a clear answer from an insurer directly...

Reply
breezel77
Posts: 2
(@breezel77)
New Member
Joined:

I get where you're coming from, but honestly, I'd be cautious assuming smaller local companies always have clearer policies. Had a similar situation with our family car—nothing vintage, just a Subaru—but added some safety mods like better tires and suspension upgrades. Thought our local agent was clear too, until we had a claim and suddenly those "safety improvements" were considered "performance mods." Definitely good you're asking questions upfront, but I'd still double-check everything they promise...just in case.

Reply
aaront40
Posts: 5
(@aaront40)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, insurance can be tricky like that. Had a similar issue with my Audi—thought ceramic brakes were clearly safety upgrades, but nope, insurer saw them as performance mods. Good you're double-checking now... saves headaches later.

Reply
Page 15 / 89
Share:
Scroll to Top