Notifications
Clear all

Letting friends drive your car in MN: better to add them or rely on permissive use?

403 Posts
381 Users
0 Reactions
3,092 Views
Posts: 12
(@shadowghost430)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the “pop quiz” vibe—insurance is like a maze with invisible walls sometimes. Here’s how I play it, just to keep my sanity:

- If someone’s driving my car more than once in a blue moon, I just add them. It’s less hassle than trying to explain “well, they only borrow it sometimes…” after an accident.
- Permissive use is fine for that random airport run or emergency, but I don’t trust it for regular stuff. There’s always some clause that’ll trip you up if things go sideways.
- Had a friend who thought he was covered when his roommate borrowed his car—turns out the insurer had a “household member” exclusion buried in the policy. Whole thing turned into a mess.

I’d rather pay a few bucks extra and sleep easy than roll the dice with fine print. Insurance companies are basically professional loophole finders, right?


Reply
apolloarcher
Posts: 7
(@apolloarcher)
Active Member
Joined:

I hear you on the “pop quiz” vibe—insurance is like a maze with invisible walls sometimes.

That “household member” exclusion is sneaky—insurance companies really do have a knack for hiding those gotchas. I get the urge to just add anyone who drives your car more than once in a while, but sometimes the extra premium feels steep, especially if it’s just a roommate or sibling who barely drives. Have you ever tried negotiating with your insurer about temporary drivers, or is it always a hard line? I’ve heard some companies are more flexible than others, but maybe that’s just wishful thinking...


Reply
mollywalker129
Posts: 17
(@mollywalker129)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve run into that “household member” exclusion more times than I can count, and it always seems to catch people off guard. There was this one time a client called me in a panic because her college-age brother borrowed her car for a weekend trip home—just a quick visit, nothing crazy. He got rear-ended at a stoplight (not his fault), but the other driver’s insurance tried to dodge responsibility, and then her own policy started poking around about whether he lived there “enough” to count as a household member. The whole thing turned into this weird dance of definitions and technicalities.

I’ve tried to talk with underwriters about temporary drivers before, especially when someone’s situation is kind of in that gray area—a roommate who’s barely ever home, or a sibling who comes by once every few months. Sometimes you get lucky and they’ll let you add someone for just a month or two, but most of the time it’s pretty rigid. There are companies out there with “occasional driver” options, but they’re rare and usually come with their own fine print.

Honestly, I wish there was more flexibility. It feels like insurance policies are written for people with 1950s households—everyone living under one roof, sharing one car. Real life is messier. I’ve even seen folks try to rely on “permissive use,” thinking it covers everything, but if the person driving is technically part of your household (even if it’s just half the week), that’s where things can get dicey.

It bugs me how much of this stuff comes down to how an adjuster interprets your living situation after something goes wrong. You’d think paying extra would buy you peace of mind, not just more paperwork... But yeah, I’ve pushed back before and sometimes gotten exceptions for short-term situations—like when someone’s car is in the shop and they need yours for a week—but it always feels like you’re asking for a favor rather than using something you’re entitled to.

If only insurers gave out those “pop quiz” answers upfront instead of hiding them in the back pages of the policy...


Reply
Posts: 4
(@food_lisa5374)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from, but I actually think the “permissive use” thing works better than people give it credit for—at least for true one-off situations. Like, if your friend borrows your car once to run errands, most policies in MN are pretty clear about covering that. The gray area is when someone’s using your car regularly, and yeah, then it gets messy. But I’d rather have a strict line than have to argue with an adjuster every time.

It bugs me how much of this stuff comes down to how an adjuster interprets your living situation after something goes wrong.

That’s fair, but if they made it too flexible, people would just skirt the rules and never add anyone. I’d rather deal with a little paperwork than risk my rates going up because my “occasional driver” turned into a full-time roommate. Just my two cents.


Reply
mwhiskers87
Posts: 10
(@mwhiskers87)
Active Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying about the paperwork being worth it, but sometimes it feels like the line between “occasional” and “regular” use is pretty blurry. What if your friend borrows your car every other week—does that count as regular? I’ve read some policies that don’t really define it clearly. Has anyone actually had an adjuster push back on a claim because of this?


Reply
Page 75 / 81
Share:
Scroll to Top