Notifications
Clear all

Letting friends drive your car in MN: better to add them or rely on permissive use?

636 Posts
581 Users
0 Reactions
11.4 K Views
Posts: 22
(@guitarist68)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Adding Friends Is Less Stressful Than Arguing With Insurance

I totally get the anxiety around this. A few years back, my brother-in-law borrowed our minivan to help move some furniture. He’s a careful driver, but of course, that’s when someone rear-ended him at a stoplight. The other driver was at fault, but our insurance still got involved for the repairs.

We hadn’t added him to the policy—figured it was just a one-off, and “permissive use” would cover it. Well, the claim went through eventually, but not without a bunch of phone calls and paperwork. The adjuster kept circling back to how often he’d driven it before, whether he had keys, if he’d ever used it for work... It felt like they were looking for any excuse to deny coverage. In the end, they paid out, but it took weeks longer than it should have.

Ever since then, I just add anyone who might drive more than once or twice in a year. It’s a little extra on the premium, but honestly, I’d rather pay that than deal with the headache again. Insurance companies seem to love those fuzzy definitions—“occasional” means whatever they want it to mean when money’s on the line.

Funny thing is, my neighbor swears he’s never had an issue with permissive use claims. Maybe he’s just luckier than me? Or maybe it depends on the adjuster you get that day. Either way, I’m not rolling those dice again.


Reply
Posts: 16
(@mochaskater306)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s the thing—permissive use sounds simple, but it’s a gray area in practice. I’ve seen claims get bogged down over “occasional” versus “regular” use, especially if someone borrows your car more than once or twice. Some companies are stricter than others, too. Out of curiosity, did your premium jump much after adding extra drivers? I’ve had clients surprised it wasn’t as expensive as they expected.


Reply
hiker93
Posts: 11
(@hiker93)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve seen claims get bogged down over “occasional” versus “regular” use, especially if someone borrows your car more than once or twice.

That’s exactly what worries me. It’s easy to think, “Oh, they’re just borrowing it for the weekend,” but if it happens a few times, suddenly you’re in that gray area. I always tell people to check their policy wording—some companies are super vague about what counts as “occasional.” If you want to play it safe, here’s what I do:

1. Check your insurer’s definition of permissive use. Some spell it out, others don’t.
2. If a friend or family member is going to drive more than once in a blue moon, just add them as a driver. Like you said, the premium bump isn’t always that bad. Mine only went up about $8/month when I added my brother.
3. Keep a record of who’s driving and when, just in case there’s ever a dispute.

I know it sounds like overkill, but after seeing a neighbor get stuck with a denied claim because his buddy had borrowed the car “too often,” I’d rather be cautious than sorry. Insurance companies love their technicalities...


Reply
Posts: 17
(@mochah43)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I know it sounds like overkill, but after seeing a neighbor get stuck with a denied claim because his buddy had borrowed the car “too often,” I’d rather be cautious than sorry.

Same here. My cousin borrowed my minivan a few weekends in a row when his was in the shop, and I actually called my agent just to double check. Turns out, two times was fine, but three would've been pushing it. Honestly, that tiny premium increase is worth avoiding the headache if something goes sideways.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@zeuseditor)
Active Member
Joined:

Permissive use is one of those things most folks assume covers way more than it actually does. The “occasional” bit is so vague, and insurers interpret it differently—plus, adjusters aren’t known for being generous if there’s a gray area. Personally, I’d rather pay the extra few bucks to add someone if they’re driving regularly. It’s just not worth risking a denied claim over something so easy to prevent. Seen too many people get burned thinking they were covered when they weren’t.


Reply
Page 59 / 128
Share:
Scroll to Top