Notifications
Clear all

Letting friends drive your car in MN: better to add them or rely on permissive use?

674 Posts
614 Users
0 Reactions
13.4 K Views
ashleyt72
Posts: 2
(@ashleyt72)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, you nailed it with the gray area stuff—insurance adjusters don’t exactly give folks the benefit of the doubt. I’ve seen “permissive use” work, but only when everything lines up perfectly. Did you actually say “yeah, take my car”? Was it for a quick grocery run, or is your roommate using it for DoorDash? Those details matter way more than people realize. Sometimes I wonder if it’s even worth the hassle to risk it, especially if someone’s driving your car more than just once or twice. The fine print is where they get you every time...


Reply
Posts: 3
(@katieh43)
New Member
Joined:

The fine print is where they get you every time...

Yeah, that fine print is brutal. I used to think “permissive use” was enough, but after my cousin’s claim got denied because his buddy was using the car for pizza delivery, I’m way more cautious. If someone’s driving your car regularly, adding them just seems safer. Insurance companies love loopholes.


Reply
david_white
Posts: 10
(@david_white)
Active Member
Joined:

I get being cautious, but isn’t there a difference between someone using your car for work vs. just running errands or borrowing it for the weekend? I mean, if you add everyone who ever drives your car, doesn’t your premium skyrocket? I’d rather just say no to anything commercial and stick with permissive use for normal stuff... unless I’m missing something in the policy fine print again.


Reply
finance_bailey1321
Posts: 4
(@finance_bailey1321)
New Member
Joined:

Yeah, you’re not missing much—there’s a big difference between letting a buddy borrow your car for a Target run and someone using it for DoorDash or whatever. I’ve always stuck with permissive use for friends and family, and never had an issue. Adding everyone would be overkill unless they’re driving it all the time. Just keep an eye on the fine print about exclusions for commercial use... insurance companies love their loopholes.


Reply
Posts: 17
(@timj91)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, you nailed it with the commercial use thing—insurance companies will do anything to wriggle out of a claim if they can. I’ve had my share of headaches with them over the years, especially since my car isn’t exactly your average sedan. They’ll look for any excuse, and “used for delivery” is a big red flag.

I get what you’re saying about not adding everyone under the sun to your policy. If someone’s just borrowing your car for a quick errand, permissive use should cover it. But here’s where I get a little twitchy: what happens if your “friend” gets into an accident and suddenly your rates skyrocket or, worse, the insurance company tries to deny coverage because they find some technicality? I’ve seen it happen. One time, a buddy of mine let his cousin drive his BMW for a weekend trip—nothing commercial, just a road trip—and when the cousin rear-ended someone, the insurer tried to claim he wasn’t a “regular” driver and made a fuss about coverage. It worked out in the end, but it was a mess.

I guess my question is: how much do you trust your friends not to push the limits? And are you willing to risk the hassle if something goes sideways? For me, if it’s someone I really trust and it’s just once in a while, fine. But if they’re going to be behind the wheel more than occasionally—or if there’s even a hint they might use it for something like DoorDash—I’d rather just add them and avoid the drama.

You’re right that adding everyone is overkill, but sometimes peace of mind is worth the extra paperwork. Insurance loopholes are real, and they’re not on our side. Just my two cents...


Reply
Page 33 / 135
Share:
Scroll to Top