Notifications
Clear all

Deciding between just liability or going all-in with full coverage on Liberty Mutual

122 Posts
119 Users
0 Reactions
1,419 Views
andrewmusician367
Posts: 6
Topic starter
(@andrewmusician367)
Active Member
Joined:

Here’s what I did to figure this out: First, I grabbed a quote for both coverage types. Then I listed out what my car’s worth (not much, honestly) and checked if I still owed anything on it. After that, I compared what I’d pay out of pocket if something happened vs. what the insurance would actually cover. Lastly, I factored in my driving habits—like, am I parking in sketchy places a lot? Anyone have a quicker way to decide, or maybe some tricks to save on full coverage?


121 Replies
Posts: 4
(@marydiver1109)
New Member
Joined:

Honestly, if your car’s not worth much and you don’t owe anything, I’d just stick with liability. Full coverage is great if you’ve got a newer ride or park in places where it might get trashed, but otherwise it’s just money down the drain. I drive a beater to work every day and dropped full coverage years ago—haven’t missed it once. If you’re worried about theft or vandalism, maybe bump up comp only, but otherwise, why pay more?


Reply
julier11
Posts: 6
(@julier11)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but I think it really depends on the car and your risk tolerance. My last car was a mid-range sedan and I did exactly what you’re describing—just liability, no regrets. But now that I’ve got something a bit pricier, I can’t bring myself to drop full coverage. Even if it’s paid off, the thought of someone sideswiping me in a parking lot or a random hailstorm doing thousands in damage makes me nervous. Repairs aren’t cheap, especially for certain brands.

It’s not just about the car’s value either. Some parts are ridiculously expensive to replace, and even a minor accident can turn into a big bill. I’d rather pay a bit more each month than get hit with a repair that wipes out my savings. Guess it comes down to how much risk you’re willing to take on yourself... For me, peace of mind is worth the extra cost, at least for now.


Reply
business_rocky
Posts: 23
(@business_rocky)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I totally get that—my last car was an old Civic and I just had liability. Never worried much, but now I’m driving a newer Mazda and honestly, I can’t shake the anxiety about random stuff happening. The price of one fender bender could easily outweigh years of full coverage. Maybe it’s overkill, but with how much time I spend on the road, peace of mind feels worth it... at least until the premium jumps again.


Reply
andrewmusician367
Posts: 6
Topic starter
(@andrewmusician367)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, that peace of mind factor is hard to put a price on, especially with a newer car. I see a lot of folks switch to full coverage when their vehicle’s value jumps or their commute gets longer. One thing I’d add—sometimes bundling policies (like home and auto) can shave a surprising amount off the premium. Also, raising your deductible just a bit can make full coverage more affordable without losing the bigger protections. It’s always a balancing act between risk and cost, but sounds like you’re thinking it through the right way.


Reply
Page 1 / 25
Share:
Scroll to Top