Notifications
Clear all

If You Had To Switch Insurance In Kentucky, Who Would You Trust?

547 Posts
517 Users
0 Reactions
8,110 Views
Posts: 13
(@gardener726042)
Active Member
Joined:

But does a smaller company actually answer faster, or do they just have fewer commercials?

Funny you mention that—I've seen both sides. Had a client last year with a local mutual in Kentucky, and their claim for hail damage was handled in under a week. No endless hold music, just a real person picking up. But I've also seen small outfits get overwhelmed during big storms and suddenly they're not so quick. It's not always about size...sometimes it's about how organized their claims folks are behind the scenes. Your skepticism's fair, but I've seen it work out better than expected.


Reply
shadow_fox
Posts: 13
(@shadow_fox)
Active Member
Joined:

I get what you’re saying about smaller companies sometimes being quicker, but I’ve actually had the opposite happen. During a big ice storm, my neighbor’s small insurer just couldn’t keep up—she waited almost three weeks for an adjuster. I guess it’s like you said:

it's about how organized their claims folks are behind the scenes
. Sometimes those bigger companies have more resources to throw at a crisis, even if you have to deal with the hold music. It’s kind of a toss-up, honestly.


Reply
Posts: 16
(@gandalfe97)
Active Member
Joined:

That’s a fair point about the bigger companies having more resources when things get wild. I’ve always leaned toward the “bigger is safer” side, mostly because I’ve seen friends get stuck in the same boat as your neighbor—waiting ages for a response after a storm. Here’s how I usually approach it:

First, I check how many adjusters they actually have in the area. Some of those smaller outfits look great on paper, but if they’re sending someone from three counties over, that’s a red flag for me. Next, I dig into their disaster response track record—sometimes you can find reviews or news stories about how they handled big events.

I get that the big guys can be slow with the phone queues, but at least you know they’ll eventually get to you. For me, it’s about minimizing risk, especially when you’re out on the road a lot. I’d rather deal with a little bureaucracy than be left hanging if my car gets iced in or worse. Just my two cents...


Reply
psychology933
Posts: 19
(@psychology933)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I hear you on the bigger companies, but I’ve had a weirdly good experience with a smaller local group after a hailstorm last year. They got someone out to check my van within two days, which shocked me after hearing all the horror stories. I’m curious—has anyone here actually had a big company leave them hanging during a bad weather event, or is it mostly smaller firms that drop the ball?


Reply
beekeeper302033
Posts: 22
(@beekeeper302033)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Had a similar situation last year with a busted windshield on my Audi—big company, lots of promises, but it took almost two weeks just to get an adjuster out. I get why folks go local, but honestly, it’s a gamble either way. Ever notice how the big guys love to advertise “fast claims” until there’s a storm and then...crickets? Maybe it’s just luck of the draw, but I’m not convinced size matters as much as they say.


Reply
Page 47 / 110
Share:
Scroll to Top