Notifications
Clear all

just saw a story about a guy in Kansas whose car got totaled by hail, and turns out his insurance didn't cover it.

367 Posts
334 Users
0 Reactions
2,157 Views
lscott40
Posts: 4
(@lscott40)
New Member
Joined:

That's exactly why I'm hesitant about picking my first insurance policy. I've been reading through sample contracts online, and some of these clauses are so oddly specific—like exclusions for damage from falling branches if the tree isn't on your property. Who even thinks of scenarios like that? Guess I'll have to ask a ton of questions before signing anything... better safe than sorry, I suppose.

Reply
Posts: 5
(@photography270)
Active Member
Joined:

"some of these clauses are so oddly specific—like exclusions for damage from falling branches if the tree isn't on your property."

You'd be surprised how often those oddly specific clauses come up in actual claims... I've seen some pretty unusual scenarios myself. You're doing the right thing by reading carefully and asking questions—it's definitely worth the extra effort.

Reply
scoder46
Posts: 8
(@scoder46)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, those clauses can get pretty wild sometimes. I remember a friend who had water damage from a neighbor's broken sprinkler system—turns out his policy specifically excluded damage from "external irrigation sources." Like, who even thinks to check for something like that beforehand? Insurance companies seem to have seen it all and then some, so they add these hyper-specific exclusions to cover themselves.

Honestly, after hearing stories like the hail guy in Kansas, I've started double-checking my own coverage more often. It's tedious, sure, but better than finding out you're not covered when your car's already dented up like a golf ball...

Reply
charlies24
Posts: 10
(@charlies24)
Active Member
Joined:

Had a similar experience myself. A couple of years ago my windshield got cracked by some random debris flying off a truck on the freeway. I figured, no big deal, right? Called insurance and turns out my policy specifically excluded "road debris damage" unless I had comprehensive coverage—which I thought I did, but apparently didn't tick the right box or something.

Honestly, who even thinks about these super specific scenarios when signing up? Feels like you need a crystal ball just to pick the right options. Now I'm always second-guessing whether I'm covered for stuff like tree branches falling during storms or potholes wrecking my alignment. Definitely worth spending the extra ten minutes now to avoid headaches later...but it still feels like insurance companies count on us not reading every little detail.

Reply
sgarcia16
Posts: 7
(@sgarcia16)
Active Member
Joined:

Been there myself—it's like you need a law degree just to understand what you're signing up for. A few years back, I hit a pothole hard enough to bend my rim, and surprise...insurance wouldn't cover it since it was "road hazard damage." Now I double-check everything, but honestly, who can predict every little thing that might happen? Don't beat yourself up over it; insurance fine print is practically designed to trip us up.

Reply
Page 4 / 74
Share:
Scroll to Top