Notifications
Clear all

just saw a story about a guy in Kansas whose car got totaled by hail, and turns out his insurance didn't cover it.

560 Posts
504 Users
0 Reactions
6,890 Views
Posts: 9
(@zvortex24)
Active Member
Joined:

It’s honestly kind of frustrating how “full coverage” sounds like you’re set, but then you find out it’s just a marketing thing. I’m shopping for my first policy right now and it’s like a maze—so many little details buried in the fine print. I totally get double-checking everything, especially when you’re on a budget and can’t afford nasty surprises. Insurance companies really don’t make it easy for regular folks to know what’s actually covered. You’re not alone in feeling misled.


Reply
debbiec45
Posts: 1
(@debbiec45)
New Member
Joined:

Full Coverage Isn’t Magic Armor

- Gotta admit, “full coverage” fooled me too the first time. Thought I was invincible. Spoiler: I was not.
- But honestly, I kinda get why they break it down. My driving record’s a mess (speeding tickets, fender benders... you name it), so if they just bundled everything, my premium would be through the roof.
- Not saying it’s fair, but if you’re a risk magnet like me, sometimes picking and choosing coverage is the only way to keep things semi-affordable.
- Still, wish they’d call it “partial peace of mind” instead. Would save a lot of headaches.


Reply
Posts: 7
(@finance_zelda)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, “full coverage” is one of those phrases that sounds way better than it actually is. I learned the hard way too—thought I was covered for everything until a tree branch took out my windshield. Turns out, if you don’t have comprehensive, you’re just outta luck. Insurance companies really need a better marketing team... or maybe they know exactly what they’re doing.


Reply
ericchef
Posts: 7
(@ericchef)
Active Member
Joined:

“full coverage” is one of those phrases that sounds way better than it actually is.

Man, ain’t that the truth. I remember when I first got my ’72 Chevelle, I thought “full coverage” meant I was good no matter what. Then a raccoon decided to use my hood as a trampoline... turns out, no comprehensive, no dice. It’s wild how much you gotta read the fine print. Insurance folks definitely know what they’re doing with that wording. If you’ve got a car you care about, especially something classic, it’s worth double-checking exactly what’s in your policy.


Reply
cyclotourist441316
Posts: 11
(@cyclotourist441316)
Active Member
Joined:

Yeah, “full coverage” is one of those things that sounds like it covers everything, but it really doesn’t. I learned the hard way when a tree branch smashed my windshield—turns out, liability plus collision wasn’t enough. Now I always make sure I’ve got comprehensive, especially with how unpredictable weather’s been lately. It’s a pain to read through all the policy details, but honestly, it’s better than getting stuck with a huge bill. Insurance companies definitely bank on people not noticing the gaps.


Reply
Page 112 / 112
Share:
Scroll to Top