Notifications
Clear all

Finding affordable car insurance after 65 in kansas—anyone else struggling?

800 Posts
730 Users
0 Reactions
16.9 K Views
Posts: 10
(@pcloud16)
Active Member
Joined:

If you’re not driving much, usage-based can work, but some of those programs track everything—speed, braking, even what time you drive. Not everyone’s comfortable with that level of monitoring.

Yeah, I tried one of those “pay as you go” things last year. The app dinged me for “hard braking” every time I stopped at a yellow light. Felt like I was being graded by a backseat driver. Ended up going back to my old plan. I do agree about the bundling though—got a small break when I added my renters insurance. Not huge, but it covered a couple lunches.


Reply
maxchef
Posts: 19
(@maxchef)
Active Member
Joined:

The app dinged me for “hard braking” every time I stopped at a yellow light. Felt like I was being graded by a backseat driver.

That’s exactly what got me too—felt like normal stops were “hard” just because I wasn’t coasting for a mile. Did you notice if your rates actually changed much after all that tracking? I was curious if the hassle was even worth it.


Reply
Posts: 6
(@mythology_ray)
Active Member
Joined:

I’ve seen that “hard braking” thing trip up a lot of folks, and honestly, I’m not convinced those apps always get it right. I tried one out myself last year—figured it couldn’t hurt to see if I’d save a few bucks. Turns out, every time I stopped for a squirrel or hit the brakes at a yellow, it’d ding me too. Felt like I was being watched by some invisible driving instructor who never learned how traffic actually works.

What really got me was how inconsistent the feedback was. One day, it’d say “great job!” after my usual commute, and the next, same route, suddenly I’m “at risk” because someone cut me off and I had to brake. It started making me second-guess normal driving habits. My wife joked that she was going to start rating my driving too.

As for rates—mine barely budged. Maybe a couple bucks off per month, but nothing close to what the app promised upfront. A friend of mine in Topeka said he actually saw his premium go up after a few months because the app flagged him for “aggressive acceleration.” He drives a 2002 Buick. Not exactly a race car.

I get why companies are pushing these trackers—they want more data—but sometimes it feels like they’re just looking for reasons to raise rates or avoid giving discounts. Maybe if you’re someone who only drives country roads at 30 mph and never hits a stoplight, you’d come out ahead... but for most of us? Not so sure.

If you’re already getting dinged for normal stops, I wouldn’t expect miracles on your bill. Sometimes old-fashioned shopping around still works better than letting an app judge your every move.


Reply
Posts: 2
(@rayartist452)
New Member
Joined:

That’s exactly the kind of thing that’s kept me from ever trying those apps. I drive a newer Mercedes, and honestly, I’m already a bit paranoid about how every little thing gets tracked these days. If the tech can’t tell the difference between slamming on the brakes for safety and just stopping at a yellow, what’s the point? Makes me wonder if it’s really about “safe driving” or just another excuse to nudge rates up.

I’ve also heard stories from friends with older cars—same deal, flagged for “aggressive” moves when they’re just trying to merge onto the highway. It’s frustrating. Do these algorithms even account for real-world traffic? Or is it all just numbers on a screen?

Shopping around still feels like the safest bet, even if it takes more time. I’d rather talk to an actual person than let an app decide if I’m a risk. At our age, shouldn’t experience count for something?


Reply
alex_gonzalez9627
Posts: 15
(@alex_gonzalez9627)
Active Member
Joined:

If the tech can’t tell the difference between slamming on the brakes for safety and just stopping at a yellow, what’s the point?

That’s honestly my biggest gripe with those tracking apps too. They’re supposed to reward “good” driving, but half the time they ding you for stuff that’s just normal traffic. I’ve seen folks get penalized for avoiding potholes or reacting to someone cutting them off... like, what are you supposed to do, just take the hit? I get that insurance companies want data, but sometimes it feels like they’re missing the whole picture.

And yeah, “experience” should count for something. I’ve seen drivers with spotless records for decades get higher rates just because of their age bracket. Doesn’t always seem fair.


Reply
Page 157 / 160
Share:
Scroll to Top