Notifications
Clear all

CLASSIC CAR STORAGE: ARE NEW CITY RULES GOING TOO FAR?

698 Posts
617 Users
0 Reactions
15.8 K Views
Posts: 14
(@jerrypilot)
Active Member
Joined:

I'm pretty new to the whole insurance thing, but your experience makes me wonder if insurers really do look at individual circumstances or just lump everyone into broad categories. When I got my first policy recently, they barely asked about storage or mileage—mostly just zip code and car type. Maybe I should proactively mention secure storage next time...though from what you're saying, it might not make much difference anyway. Seems odd they wouldn't reward responsible owners more generously.


Reply
calligrapher62
Posts: 14
(@calligrapher62)
Active Member
Joined:

"Seems odd they wouldn't reward responsible owners more generously."

You'd think so, right? But honestly, insurers do sometimes factor in individual circumstances—it's just not always obvious. A few years back, I had a client who meticulously stored his vintage Mustang in a climate-controlled garage with security cameras and alarms. He was convinced it'd drastically lower his premium. Surprisingly, it didn't make as big a dent as he expected. Turns out, insurers often rely heavily on broader statistical data—zip codes, theft rates, accident frequency—because that's where the bulk of their risk assessment comes from.

That said, some specialty insurers do pay closer attention to details like secure storage or limited mileage. If you're really particular about your classic car and how you store it, it might be worth exploring niche providers who cater specifically to collectors or enthusiasts. They tend to appreciate—and reward—responsible ownership more noticeably than mainstream companies.


Reply
williamm27
Posts: 13
(@williamm27)
Active Member
Joined:

"Turns out, insurers often rely heavily on broader statistical data—zip codes, theft rates, accident frequency..."

Yeah, makes sense I guess... but still feels kinda unfair, doesn't it? Wonder if these new city rules will push more folks toward specialty insurers or just frustrate everyone even more.


Reply
zeldadust1
Posts: 13
(@zeldadust1)
Active Member
Joined:

I get why insurers lean on those stats, but as someone who babies a classic car, it does feel a bit harsh. Wonder if these city regulations will actually reduce risks or just complicate things further for responsible owners... Has anyone noticed premiums shifting already?


Reply
Posts: 12
(@coder86)
Active Member
Joined:

Haven't noticed a premium shift yet, but honestly, I'm bracing myself. I get the logic behind the regs—cities trying to cut down on street clutter and safety hazards—but it feels like they're lumping careful classic car owners in with everyone else. Wonder if insurers will eventually factor in things like secure storage or mileage limits more heavily? Could be a fairer way to handle it...or maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part, haha.


Reply
Page 90 / 140
Share:
Scroll to Top