Yeah, clearer guidelines would help, but honestly, some inspectors just get carried away no matter what. Had a guy once tell me my mirrors were "too shiny"...like, seriously? Common sense goes a long way too.
Honestly, some inspectors seem to invent issues just to justify their job. Mirrors "too shiny"? That's a new one on me... But maybe having a clear appeals process or second opinion option could help balance things out a bit.
Mirrors being "too shiny" does sound a bit excessive, I agree. I've noticed inspectors sometimes flag minor issues that don't seem practically relevant, maybe to appear thorough or justify their role. A clear appeals process could definitely help car owners challenge questionable findings without unnecessary expenses. As someone watching every penny, I'd appreciate a fair way to dispute these oddball citations without breaking the bank...
I had a similar issue last summer when an inspector flagged my classic Mustang for having "excessively reflective chrome trim." At first, I thought it was a joke... but nope, it was a real citation. I ended up paying a small fine because challenging it seemed like more hassle than it was worth. A straightforward appeals process would definitely make sense—especially if the city keeps rolling out these oddly specific rules.
• Had a similar weird citation last year—my Benz got flagged for "overly tinted windows."
• Thought about appealing, but like you said, seemed like too much hassle for a minor fine.
• Still skeptical about these ultra-specific rules...but an easier appeals process would def help.
