Honestly, I’m not sure the mileage cap is as big a deal for everyone. I mean, if you’re only driving your classic a couple times a month, those 2,500 miles can actually go pretty far. I get that it’s annoying to keep track, but for me, the lower premium is kind of worth the hassle. Maybe it’s different if you’re hitting every car show, but I’d rather save the cash and just plan my drives a bit. Guess it depends how much you really want to be out on the road.
I get that it’s annoying to keep track, but for me, the lower premium is kind of worth the hassle.
Totally hear you on this. I don’t mind the mileage cap either—my ‘72 Charger spends more time under a cover than on the road anyway. It’s not like I’m dailying it to Costco. Plus, fewer miles means less chance of some distracted minivan driver turning my pride and joy into a hood ornament. I’ll happily trade a little paperwork for peace of mind (and cheaper insurance).
Mileage caps are a bit of a pain, but honestly, I’ve seen way too many situations where they saved folks from bigger headaches. Had a guy with a ‘68 Mustang, barely drove it, and his premium was peanuts compared to his neighbor’s daily driver. The only time he really got burned was when he forgot to log a big road trip and ended up just over the cap—paperwork nightmare, but avoidable if you keep a simple notebook in the glove box or use your phone.
I get that some people hate the idea of being “watched,” but from the claims side, it’s usually pretty hands-off unless there’s an accident or something fishy pops up. For most classic owners, those few extra forms once a year are nothing compared to what you’d pay for full-use coverage. And yeah, less time on the road means less risk—not just for dings and dents, but for those weird “acts of nature” calls I get every spring... hailstorms don’t care if your car is a garage queen.
