Notifications
Clear all

Why California’s minimum car insurance might not be enough

636 Posts
594 Users
0 Reactions
11.2 K Views
Posts: 18
(@ashleyblogger)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I get why people want more coverage, but I’m not totally convinced minimum is always a bad choice. If you drive an older car or barely use it, bumping up your premium for extra coverage might not make financial sense. I mean, yeah, if you’re in a high-traffic area with luxury cars everywhere, the risk is higher... but for some folks, that extra $30 a month really adds up over time. Guess it just depends on your situation and how much risk you’re willing to take.


Reply
baileyp99
Posts: 22
(@baileyp99)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from. Not everyone’s driving a new Tesla or racking up miles every day. For me, as a student, that extra cash matters. If your car isn’t worth much and you’re careful, minimum coverage can make sense. It’s all about balancing what you can actually afford with the risks.


Reply
robotics255
Posts: 4
(@robotics255)
New Member
Joined:

I get wanting to save every dollar, especially if your car’s not worth much. But California’s minimums are pretty low—if you rear-end a new SUV or cause a multi-car pileup, that minimum coverage might not go very far. I’ve seen friends get hit with bills way over what insurance paid out. Sometimes paying a little more up front can save you a lot of stress later. Just something to consider, even if you’re careful.


Reply
geek432
Posts: 12
(@geek432)
Active Member
Joined:

if you rear-end a new SUV or cause a multi-car pileup, that minimum coverage might not go very far.

Yeah, that’s the part that always worries me. Even a fender bender with a luxury car can get expensive fast. I bumped someone’s Tesla last year—just a scratch, but the repair bill was wild. My insurance barely covered it, and I had to pay out of pocket. Upping my coverage after that felt like a no-brainer.


Reply
patriciainventor1831
Posts: 7
(@patriciainventor1831)
Active Member
Joined:

I get where you’re coming from, but honestly, I’ve always stuck with the minimum coverage and just crossed my fingers. I know it’s risky, but I drive an older Camry and mostly stick to highways on road trips—less stop-and-go, fewer chances for fender benders.

Even a fender bender with a luxury car can get expensive fast.

That’s true, but on the flip side, I’ve had friends paying way more for higher coverage and never needing it. It’s kind of a gamble either way. For me, the monthly savings add up, and I just keep an emergency fund in case something goes sideways. Maybe not the smartest move if you’re in the city a lot or driving around fancy neighborhoods, but for my situation, it works out.

I guess it really depends on where you drive and what you’re comfortable risking. That Tesla repair bill sounds brutal though... makes me think twice about parking near anything shiny.


Reply
Page 62 / 128
Share:
Scroll to Top