Car insurance discussions and local services.

Why California’s minimum car insurance might not be enough

658 replies 25 K views
 
explorer147744
15 posts

I hear you - my wallet cries every time I renew, but then I remember that one time I hit a deer on a random Tuesday. Didn’t matter how little I drove, the bill was still massive. Anyone else ever had a “wait, THAT’S not covered?” moment with their policy?


Reply
law964
19 posts

Had a similar shock when my ‘72 Chevelle got dinged in a parking lot. Thought my policy would cover it since I had “full coverage,” but turns out the fine print didn’t include uninsured motorist property damage. Ended up paying out of pocket for most of the repairs. It’s wild how much isn’t covered unless you dig deep into the details.


Reply
12 posts

Yeah, that “full coverage” label is super misleading. I always thought it meant you’re set for anything, but nope - there’s always some loophole or missing piece. Makes me wonder how many folks actually read through every bit of their policy before signing. Has anyone here actually bumped up their uninsured motorist coverage after getting burned like this? I’m starting to think it’s worth the extra few bucks a month, even if it feels like overkill.


Reply
13 posts

Makes me wonder how many folks actually read through every bit of their policy before signing.

I tried reading mine once and my eyes glazed over by page two. I just wanted to know if my minivan was covered if a shopping cart attacked it again. But yeah, after my neighbor got rear-ended by someone with zero insurance, I upped my uninsured motorist coverage. It felt like paying for an invisible friend, but honestly, peace of mind is worth a few extra bucks. Anyone else ever feel like “full coverage” is just code for “mostly covered, unless you actually need it”?


Reply
foodie87
15 posts

I hear you on the “full coverage” thing - it’s like, you think you’re set until you actually need to file a claim and suddenly there’s a list of exceptions longer than the policy itself. I’ve got an old ‘72 Chevelle I baby, and even with extra coverage, I still worry about what’s actually protected. The fine print is brutal. Honestly, I’d rather spend my Saturday tuning carbs than decoding insurance jargon... but after seeing what repairs cost these days, I just grit my teeth and pay for the extra coverage. It’s not cheap, but neither are classic car parts.


Reply

Join the conversation

Share your experience or ask a follow-up question.

Scroll to Top