Notifications
Clear all

just saw a story about a guy in Kansas whose car got totaled by hail, and turns out his insurance didn't cover it.

1,055 Posts
900 Users
0 Reactions
47.2 K Views
frodofisher
Posts: 14
(@frodofisher)
Active Member
Joined:

It’s like you need a law degree just to understand what’s actually included.

Man, I feel this way every time my renewal comes up. I’ve had a couple tickets and a fender bender, so my rates are already wild, but even then, “full coverage” is just a marketing thing. It doesn’t mean everything’s covered—just that you’ve got liability plus collision and comprehensive. But even comprehensive has weird limits. Like, hail damage? That’s usually under comprehensive, but if you skipped it to save cash (which I did for a year), you’re out of luck.

I learned the hard way when my car got sideswiped in a parking lot and the other driver bailed. Thought I was good since I had “full coverage,” but turns out my deductible was higher than the repair cost. It’s all in the details... and yeah, those policy docs are brutal to read.

If you’re ever unsure, honestly just call your agent and ask super specific “what if” questions. Saved me from making some dumb assumptions more than once.


Reply
mentor73
Posts: 19
(@mentor73)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I get where you’re coming from, but I’ve actually had a different experience. My policy is super detailed—yeah, it’s a pain to read, but it spells out exactly what’s covered. I just make my agent walk me through the weird stuff, like hail or vandalism. It’s a hassle upfront, but with the cars I drive, I’d rather be over-insured than risk a nasty surprise. Sometimes paying a bit more for peace of mind is worth it... even if the paperwork is a nightmare.


Reply
Posts: 20
(@jong34)
Eminent Member
Joined:

I get the idea of wanting to be over-insured, but sometimes I wonder if it’s just the insurance companies winning out. I’ve skimmed my policy a few times, but honestly, all the legal jargon makes my eyes glaze over... I mostly rely on what the agent tells me, which probably isn’t smart. Have you ever actually had to make a claim for hail or something weird? Did they give you any trouble or was it as straightforward as your agent made it sound? I keep hearing stories about people thinking they’re covered, only to find out they missed some tiny detail buried in the paperwork. Makes me wonder if it’s even possible to cover every base without going broke.


Reply
Posts: 12
(@animation819)
Active Member
Joined:

Honestly, I’ve never had to make a hail claim, but I’ve heard enough horror stories to not trust just what the agent says. Did you check if you have comprehensive coverage? That’s usually what covers hail, not basic liability. Insurance companies love to skip over that detail unless you ask, which is pretty shady. I read my policy line by line once and yeah, it sucked, but at least I know what’s actually covered now... way too easy to get burned otherwise.


Reply
Posts: 8
(@robotics_aaron)
Active Member
Joined:

Not gonna lie, I get why people are wary about insurance details—there’s a lot of fine print and it’s not exactly thrilling reading. But I do think it’s a bit harsh to say agents always skip over stuff like comprehensive coverage. Most of the folks I know in the business actually try to walk people through what’s covered and what’s not, especially when it comes to stuff like hail or theft. The problem is, a lot of people just want the cheapest policy and don’t really want to talk about all the “what ifs” until something happens. I’ve had people tell me straight up, “Just give me the minimum,” and then get mad later when they find out hail damage isn’t included.

That said, you’re totally right about reading your policy. It’s a pain, but it’s the only way to really know what you’re paying for. I’ve seen people get burned because they assumed “full coverage” meant literally everything, when really it just means liability plus whatever else you add on. Hail, falling trees, even hitting a deer—those are all comprehensive, not liability.

One thing I wish more people knew: you can usually add comprehensive for not a ton more per month, especially if your car isn’t super new. It’s not always pushed because, honestly, some folks just don’t want to hear about extra costs. But if you live somewhere like Kansas where hail is a real risk, it’s worth asking about.

I get the frustration, though. Insurance isn’t exactly transparent, and nobody wants to find out the hard way that they’re not covered. But I wouldn’t say it’s always shady—sometimes it’s just a communication breakdown, or people not wanting to dig into the details until it’s too late.


Reply
Page 208 / 211
Share:
Scroll to Top